Chossidmom's Spam Thread of Covid Vaccine Info - welcome

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Wed, May 08 2024, 10:06 am

I think this is very significant.
During Covid (and still now) Youtube and other platforms have consistently removed videos for "not conforming to community standards" when the videos contained any info about the dangers of the vaccine, doctors' opinions on the safety etc. Major censoring took place and still does.

Now, a Youtuber named Eloise Boise in Quebec is suing Youtube and a recent ruling gave her the OK to go forward with a class action lawsuit.

https://thecanadianindependent.....email

Quebec YouTuber Éloïse Boies, the primary plaintiff in a class-action lawsuit against YouTube regarding COVID-19 censorship, joined us to talk about the recent court ruling that has given authorization for the lawsuit to move forward.

Éloïse Boies is a YouTuber with the channel 'Élo Wants to Know.' She has just been granted authorization to proceed with a class-action lawsuit against YouTube by a Quebec Superior Court judge. The lawsuit alleges that the platform has been censoring content related to the Covid-19 pandemic, vaccines, and the Covid-19 virus that it disagrees with, citing it as medical misinformation.

You can read more about Éloïse's class action lawsuit at the below.

Éloïse Boies, pictured above, is a YouTuber with the channel 'Élo Wants to Know.' She has been granted authorization to proceed with a class-action lawsuit against YouTube. The lawsuit alleges that the platform has been censoring content related to the pandemic, vaccines, and the Covid-19 virus that it disagrees with, citing it as medical misinformation.

The plaintiff, Éloïse Boies, who is legally represented by William Desrochers, alleges that YouTube, owned by Google LLC, censored three of her videos. YouTube cited a violation of its platform policy, stating that Boies spread "incorrect medical information contradicting that of local health authorities or the World Health Organization (WHO) regarding COVID-19."

The class action includes “Any person, natural or legal, who has used or visited YouTube since March 15, 2020, and who has seen their videos directly or indirectly linked to the Covid-19 pandemic, censored or who, having wanted to do so, was unable to read or access these videos while residing in Quebec or having an establishment there."

According to court documents, the three videos Boies alleges were taken down and censored by YouTube are as follows:

"On or around January 5, 2021, YouTube removed the video titled 'Censorship.' In this video, Boies argues that large companies like Amazon, Facebook, and YouTube, along with the government, censor information. She mentions government engagement in propaganda, a doctor's claim of being pressured to identify COVID-19 as the cause of death, prohibition of all debate, and stigmatization of opponents of the dominant discourse with degrading labels such as 'anti-vaccines' or 'conspiracists.'"

"On or around August 29, 2021, YouTube removed the video titled 'Why Refuse Vaccines?'. In this video, Boies argues that several scientific experts, including Dr. Robert Malone, oppose COVID-19 vaccination but encounter censorship. She mentions the absence of thorough analysis regarding the risks and benefits of the COVID-19 vaccine, insufficient testing, emerging concerns like fertility issues, censorship of credible individuals, suspicions of a hidden government agenda tied to vaccination passports, and multiple medical and political reasons for vaccine refusal."

"In November 2022, YouTube removed the interview video featuring Dr. Louis Fouché, a French doctor and spokesperson for the Réinfo Covid Collective. Dr. Fouché criticizes the falsehoods propagated by authorities, such as portraying the pandemic as a deadly epidemic with no solutions besides isolation, distancing, mask-wearing, and vaccination. He argues that the virus is benign for most individuals, there are identifiable vulnerable groups, curative treatments exist but are impeded by authorities, most health measures are ineffective and cause significant collateral damage, and vaccines are neither universally effective nor safe for all age groups. Dr. Fouché also accuses the system of corruption, manipulation of scientific studies and data, and employing social engineering techniques and mass media to shape public perception."

The plaintiff primarily argues that YouTube's content control related to the COVID-19 pandemic is an unlawful an intentional infringement on freedom of expression, which is protected by the Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms.

Google contends that it hasn't breached the Charter since it's not obliged to offer a space for sharing videos regardless of their content. Additionally, it asserts that its platform is private and can be managed according to its own rules and preferences.

Superior Court Judge Lukasz Granosik mentions in his judgement that "Freedom of expression does not only mean freedom of speech, but also freedom of publication and freedom of creation. Granosik then quotes from the Supreme Court of Canada saying, "it is difficult to imagine a guaranteed freedom which is more important than freedom of expression in a democratic society."

Judge Granosik concluded after reviewing all the facts in the case that, "If Google manages and controls the content found on the YouTube platform and therefore takes actions in this direction, it cannot immediately deny all responsibility. If it carries out censorship by preventing certain people from posting videos and prevents other people from viewing these same videos, it thus hinders the free circulation of ideas and exposes itself to having to defend its ways of doing things."

Google is ordered to "pay the plaintiff and each member of the group who published content on YouTube related to the COVID-19 pandemic and was censored, the sum of $1,000 as compensatory damages, and $1,000 in punitive damages with interest at the legal rate, along with additional compensation provided for by law since the filing of the request for authorization to take collective action, as per the court's decision."

The judgment further orders that Google must "cease any form of censorship or classification of publications having the effect of preventing YouTube users from propagating and receiving messages or information contradicting those of health authorities, governments, and the World Health Organization, or any other similar body."

In addressing the concerns regarding viewers and visitors to the YouTube platform who may have been 'deprived of viewing prohibited content,' Judge Granosik chose not to rule on an amount for compensatory and punitive damages at this time. Instead, he deferred this decision to be addressed collectively at a subsequent hearing.

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Tue, Jul 23 2024, 8:11 am

German Scientists Confirm: Covid Shots Directly Linked to Sudden Deaths Surge
An explosive new study has provided evidence of a direct link between Covid mRNA injections and the global surge in sudden deaths.

https://lionessofjudah.substac.....email

JUL 21, 2024

By Frank Bergman July 20, 2024

An explosive new study has provided evidence of a direct link between Covid mRNA injections and the global surge in sudden deaths.

The findings of the bombshell study were just published by a group of renowned researchers, sending shockwaves through the scientific community.

The study was conducted by Christof Kuhbandner, PhD, Professor of Psychology at the University of Regensburg in Bavaria Germany, and mathematician Prof. Matthias Reitzner at Osnabrück University, a public research university located in the city of Osnabrück in Lower Saxony.

The study directly contradicts the “safe and effective” narrative that has been peddled about the mRNA injections since they were first pushed onto the public in early 2021.

In their study, the top scientists identified a direct correlation between surging excess mortality in Germany and Covid mRNA injections.

The esteemed authors of the study are now raising the alarm about the devastating side effects of the shots and calling for governments to launch full investigations into their explosive findings.

The pre-print paper for the study is titled “Differential Increases in Excess Mortality in the German Federal States During the COVID-19 Pandemic.”

The German academic researchers initially sought to analyze the influence of COVID-19 on mortality in the sixteen German federal states.

However, they found during the analysis that the Covid “vaccines” themselves are causing the surge in sudden deaths, and not the virus.

As part of the study, the pair estimated the burden of the COVID-19 pandemic separately for each federal state by calculating state-specific excess mortalities for the three pandemic years:

04/2020-03/2021

04/2021-03/2022

04/2022-03/2023

They continued by exploring several key state-specific quantities to determine the extent to which these covary with the excess mortality.

Among the explored quantities are aspects related to the pandemic (strength of measures, COVID-19 infections, and vaccination rates) and aspects unrelated to the pandemic, such as mean age, gross domestic product, poverty rates, and proportions of people in need of care.

Estimating excess mortality, Kuhbandner and Reitzner on a state-by-state basis compared the observed number of all-cause deaths with the number of statistically expected all-cause deaths.

The duo makes use of German life tables and longevity trends, state-specific population tables, and state factors as a means of estimating the expected number of deaths.

The results yield for each federal state separate estimates for the expected number of all-cause deaths had there been no pandemic

The German scientists found a range of excess mortality by the federal state during the COVID-19 pandemic years.

Across all German federal states, excess mortality was small in the first pandemic year.

However, the figure increased in the second and soared significantly in the third pandemic year.

This is despite the introduction of near-universal vaccination across German society.

Excess death increases varied substantially across the federal states.

Regarding the covariations with the explored state-specific quantities, the authors call our attention to two correlation patterns.

“In the first two years of the pandemic, but not in the third, there was a strong correlation between excess mortality and the number of reported COVID deaths, suggesting that the differences in excess mortality observed earlier in the pandemic are due to differences in the levels of exposure to COVID-19,” they write in the study’s paper.

Kuhbandner and Reitzner educate that “this cannot explain the increase of excess mortality in the second and third pandemic years because the number of COVID-19 deaths decreased instead of increased in almost all federal states.”

Raising alarm, the authors emphasize that “ the increase in excess mortality, an increasingly strong positive correlation with the vaccination rate of a federal state is observed, which reaches a value of r = 0.85 in the third pandemic year, indicating that excess mortality increased the stronger the higher the vaccination rate in a federal state was.

“An analysis of stillbirths showed exactly the same pattern.

“No other systematic correlation pattern was observed.”

Using what the authors describe as a “state-of-the-art method of actuarial science to estimate excess mortality in the federal states of Germany in the three pandemic years (04/2020 to 03/2023)” they find that the estimated excess mortality showed substantial variance across the federal states.

After an exploratory analysis covering several key state-specific quantities, the German authors reveal that only two quantities evidence a robust correlational relationship with the observed excess mortality: COVID-19 deaths and the COVID-19 vaccination rate.

Importantly, excess mortality in the first and second pandemic years strongly correlated with the reported number of deaths and infections; and in the second and third pandemic years, “an increasingly stronger relationship between excess mortality and the vaccination rate was observed.”

This observation, “contrary to what would be expected with an effective vaccination” points to positive instead of negative correlations.

Or put simply; “the more vaccinations were administered in a federal state, the greater the increase in excess mortality.”

The authors articulate that the specific correlational finding synchronizes with previous correlational findings in the temporal domain.

The study proves that excess mortality was highest during the months with a high number of vaccinations.

The scientists conclude that the soaring excess mortality occurring both in regions and in time windows in which many vaccinations took place provides direct correlational evidence that the vaccinations had a negative effect instead of a positive effect.

Unfortunately, the present findings support other referenced concerns about Covid mRNA injections.

The study’s findings substantiate the suspicion that the negative side effects of the injections far outweigh the positive effects, according to the German authors.

The paper is currently awaiting peer review before it is published for greater evidentiary weight.

Source: slaynews.com

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Tue, Jul 23 2024, 8:16 am

https://www.2ndsmartestguyinth.....email

A new worldwide study finds there were no excess deaths due to covid and there were 16.9 million vaccine-associated deaths up to the end of 2022
Actual "vaccine" excess deaths may be far in excess of what this study concluded...

by Rhoda Wilson

A new study published on Friday found that the excess all-cause mortality for the years 2020 to 2023 in 125 countries is incompatible with a pandemic viral respiratory disease.

The authors argue that the three primary causes of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality over this period are due to mandated measures such as lockdowns; harmful medical interventions such as the use of ventilators and the denial of use of antibiotics; and, covid injections.

A study published on Thursday analysed excess mortality across the world during the covid years of 2020 to 2023. It was conducted by researchers from the Canadian non-profit Correlation Research in the Public Interest and the University of Quebec at Trois-Rivières.

The paper, titled ‘Spatiotemporal variation of excess all-cause mortality in the world (125 countries) during the Covid period 2020-2023 regarding socio economic factors and public-health and medical interventions’, was authored by Denis Rancourt, Joseph Hickey and Christian Linard.

At 521 pages it is a comprehensive report containing hundreds of figures and a detailed examination of excess all-cause mortality during the years 2020 to 2023 in 125 countries, comprising approximately 2.7 billion people which is about 35% of the world’s population.

Not all countries had sufficient data necessary for calculations. For example, only 93 countries had sufficient data to calculate excess all-cause mortality rates. From these countries, the researchers calculated the overall excess all-cause mortality rate for the 3 years 2020-2022 to be 0.392 ± 0.002 % of the 2021 population. That is between 0.390% and 0.394% of the total population of the 93 countries.

Using the excess all-cause mortality rate for the 93 countries, the researchers were able to calculate the global excess deaths in numbers of people as between 30.7 and 31.1 million people.

“Our calculated excess mortality rate [ ] corresponds to 30.9 ± 0.2 million excess deaths projected to have occurred globally for the 3-year period 2020-2022, from all causes of excess mortality during this period,” the authors wrote.

More than half of those global excess deaths, about 57%, the authors attributed to covid vaccines.

Using the data from 78 countries the researchers calculated the population-wide risk of death per injection. From this, they estimated the global all-ages excess mortality associated with covid vaccines up to 30 December 2022. They calculated that the deaths, globally, associated with covid vaccines up to 30 December 2022 was 16.9 million people.

Not only did the vaccines significantly contribute to excess mortality but the authors argued that lockdowns and harmful medical interventions also contributed to excess deaths. The paper stated:

We describe plausible mechanisms and argue that the three primary causes of death associated with the excess all-cause mortality during (and after) the covid period [2020-2023] are:

(1) Biological (including psychological) stress from mandates such as lockdowns and associated socio-economic structural changes.

(2) Non-covid-19-vaccine medical interventions such as mechanical ventilators and drugs (including denial of treatment with antibiotics).

(3) Covid-19 vaccine injection rollouts, including repeated rollouts on the same populations.

We understand the covid period mortality catastrophe to be precisely what happens when governments cause global disruptions and assaults against populations. We emphasise the importance of biological stress from sudden and profound structural societal changes and of medical assaults (including denial of treatment for bacterial pneumonias, repeated vaccine injections, etc.). We estimate that such a campaign of disruptions and assaults in a modern world will produce a global all-ages mortality rate of >0.1 % of population per year, as was also the case in the 1918 [“Spanish flu”] mortality catastrophe.

Denis G. Rancourt, Joseph Hickey, Christian Linard. Spatiotemporal variation of excess all-cause mortality in the world (125 countries) during the Covid period 2020-2023 regarding socio economic factors and public-health and medical interventions. CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest, Report, 19 July 2024. https://correlation-canada.org.....ries, pgs. 4 and 5

The hypothesis that excess all-cause mortality in the world is caused by viral respiratory disease, although believed to be supported by testing campaigns, should be abandoned, the authors stated.

The study concluded:

We are compelled to state that the public health establishment and its agents fundamentally caused all the excess mortality in the covid period, via assaults on populations, harmful medical interventions and covid-19 vaccine rollouts.

We conclude that nothing special would have occurred in terms of mortality had a pandemic not been declared and had the declaration not been acted upon.

Denis G. Rancourt, Joseph Hickey, Christian Linard. Spatiotemporal variation of excess all-cause mortality in the world (125 countries) during the Covid period 2020-2023 regarding socio economic factors and public-health and medical interventions. CORRELATION Research in the Public Interest, Report, 19 July 2024. https://correlation-canada.org.....ries, pg. 316

Expect far more death and destruction from these slow kill bioweapon “vaccines” that not only cause severe adverse events over time, but have essentially transformed its recipients into genetically modified human spike protein factories.

The best way to attenuate said severe adverse reactions like turbo cancers may be to consider inexpensive repurposed drugs that actually cure diseases; to wit:

New & Improved Synergistic Joe Tippens Protocol
Tocotrienol and Tocopherol forms (all 8) of Vitamin E (400-800mg per day, 7 days a week). A product called Gamma E by Life Extension or Perfect E are both great.

Bio-Available Curcumin (600mg per day, 2 pills per day 7 days a week). A product called Theracurmin HP by Integrative Therapeutics is bioavailable.

Vitamin D (62.5 mcg [2500 IU] seven days a week).

CBD oil (1-2 droppers full [equal to 167 to 334 mg per day] under the tongue, 7 days a week) CBD-X: The most potent full spectrum organic CBD oil, with 5,000 milligrams of activated cannabinoids and hemp compounds CBD, CBN & CBG per serving.

Fenbendazole (300mg, 6 days a week) or in the case of severe turbo cancers up to 1 gram

Ivermectin (24mg, 7 days a week) or in the case of severe turbo cancers up to 1mg/kg/day

VIR-X immune support (2 capsules per day)

↑ ChossidMom

Wed, Sep 04 2024, 5:35 am

I just found out something that I found devastating.
One of the first people who introduced me to what was REALLY happening during Covid was Attorney Reiner Fuellmich, a German American attorney who recognized what was happening and took upon himself to investigate it. He opened my eyes and to me he was a fearless hero.
About a year ago he disappeared from sight and I was wondering what happened to him.
Here is a long article I received today, describing how he is being persecuted by the German authorities. It's pretty unbelievable.
This is from Dr. Robert Malone's substack
https://www.malone.news/p/the-.....lmich

DR. REINER FUELLMICH - A POLITICAL PRISONER

Written By: Cynthia Salatino and Seba Terribilini

Well-known attorney Reiner Fuellmich is being detained under terrible conditions for reasons that have nothing to do with what he is accused of.

He had the courage to speak out on the truth and he is now paying for that courage.

He is, without any doubts, a political prisoner!

We need to spread the word regarding this scandal in order to put pressure on the orchestrators of these events in Germany.

I will give you an overview of the situation, but to start with, let me briefly summarize who Dr. Reiner Fuellmich is.

Reiner Fuellmich, 66, has been a trial lawyer in Germany and California for about 30 years and has always defended consumers and small and medium-sized enterprises against large corporations.

He has won major cases against Volkswagen (the diesel issue), Kühne und Nagel, and Deutsche Bank, for which Fuellmich himself worked, and which he defines as “one of the largest criminal organizations”.

During the lockdowns in 2020, Fuellmich and his wife were in their ranch in California, but as the situation appeared to them to be quite strange, they decided to return to Germany to find out what was really going on.

He soon recognized the COVID crimes against humanity and on July 10, together with three other lawyers, Viviane Fischer, Antonia Fischer (no relation) and Justus Hoffmann, he created the “CORONA INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE” in Berlin, whose aim was to shed light on the actions of governments, institutions, the medical community, etc. in the context of the C-19 pandemic.

The main questions Fuellmich sought answers to were:

· how dangerous is this virus?

· how reliable is the PCR test “recycled” by Drosden?

· what damage is being caused to the world’s economy by the lockdowns?

Fuellmich conducted a vast series of interviews (approx. 400) and consulted nearly 150 scientists and experts from around the world in all fields, such as:

· Nobel Prize winner Dr. Luc Montagnier,

· Famed American cardiologist and epidemiologist Dr. Peter McCullough

· Dr. Mike Yeadon (ex vice-president of Pfizer)

· Dr. Judy Mikovits (scientist)

· Dr. Robert Malone (American biochemist and pioneer of the mRNA technology)

· Forensic pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson

· German forensic pathologist Dr. Arne Burkhardt (who, together with a group of pathologists, performed autopsies on vaccinated persons)

· Dr. Astrid Stückelberger (scientist and researcher)

· Dr. Simone Gold (founder, America's Frontline Doctors)

· Dr. Antonietta Gatti (scientist)

· Dr. Mattias Desmet (psychologist)

and many others.

He also consulted financial experts, historians, investigative journalists and writers, such as:

· Ernst Wolff (writer, journalist and finance expert)

· James Corbett (writer and investigative journalist)

· Matthew Ehret (writer and journalist)

· David Icke (writer and journalist)

· Naomi Wolf (journalist, writer and US political consultant)

Fuellmich also interviewed other very influential persons, such as:

· Vera Sharav (Holocaust survivor and human rights activist)

· Catherine Austin Fitts (Former US Assistant Secretary for Housing and Urban Development and financial expert)

· Calin Georgesco (former high ranking member of the United Nations)

· Monsignor Carlo Maria Viganò (Archbishop)

· Pascal Najadi (former Swiss banker and current film producer who denounced the president of the Helvetic confederation, Alain Berset)

and many, many others.

His investigations led to the conclusions that the COVID “emergency” was never about public health, as there was no pandemic. If anything, one can speak of a “PCR test pandemic”.

It was precisely thanks to these tests, which generated more than 95% false positives, that it was possible to inflate the number of COVID “cases”.

According to Fuellmich, this was the fundamental point on which allegations of intentional wrongdoing by the governments of most nations worldwide could be based.

Furthermore, all governments have acted and are acting against the interests of their citizens and are evidently under the control of the large, multinational corporations and NGOs that Fuellmich henceforth referred to as “Mr. Global”.

Mr. Global has committed and is still committing, without a shadow of a doubt, the greatest crime against humanity.

It is important to mention that most of the interviews conducted by Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer were taped in Berlin via Zoom.

Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer however, only participated at the very beginning.

In the summer of 2022, Fuellmich left Berlin and spent several weeks in the USA where he embarked upon the “Crimes against Humanity” speaking tour, together with Dr. Judy Mikovits, Dr. Richard Fleming and Patrick Wood.

His absence from Berlin led to some dissension among the members of the “Corona Investigative Committee”. In autumn 2022, Viviane Fischer who, together with Fuellmich was the most active member of the committee, ousted Fuellmich from the committee without forewarning. This action was done by way of a Zoom meeting, and was done in a deceptive manner. She told Fuellmich that the Zoom meeting, which had already been planned, would no longer take place.

Instead, the scheduled Zoom meeting was held, and in that meeting she informed the participants that there were some irregularities which needed to be clarified, and that the Corona Investigative Committee would continue without Reiner Fuellmich.

Fuellmich only learned of this afterwards.

After some time, he then started his own new project: the ICIC (International Crimes Investigative Committee).

BACKGROUND

Before being ousted from the Corona Committee, aware of the imminent threat of seizure of the Corona Investigative Committee’s bank accounts by the German government, and the fear of no longer being able to use the funds raised by private donations to continue the Committee’s very important work, Reiner Fuellmich and Viviane Fischer decided to protect the donations by purchasing gold for the value one million Euros.

They also each took a personal loan in order to secure the funds: €700,000 (Fuellmich) and €100,000 (Viviane Fischer). These loan agreements were made in writing by way of signed contracts.

Viviane Fischer repaid the loan in installment, starting in mid-August 2022 and ending in October 2022.

In that same period, Reiner Fuellmich was negotiating the sale of his home in Göttingen, which was expected to sell for €1.350.000. Part of this sum was to be used to repay the loan.

REINER FUELLMICH MADE IT CLEAR FROM THE OUTSET THAT REPAYMENT OF THE LOAN WOULD TAKE PLACE IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION OF THE SALE OF HIS PROPERTY!

In the meantime, however, since Reiner Fuellmich’s bank accounts had been frozen, he delegated Marcel Templin (attorney-at-law, partner of Justus Hoffmann and Antonia Fischer) to manage and supervise, amongst other things, (1) a class action project which Fuellmich had been working on; and (2) the sale of Fuellmich’s home.

Reiner Fuellmich's home was indeed sold, and the money from the sale ended up in Marcel Templin's bank account, thus preventing Reiner Fuellmich from repaying the €700,000 loan. This gave Antonia Fischer, Justus Hoffman and Marcel Templin the opportunity to accuse him of having embezzled funds from the Corona Investigative Committee.

FUELLMICH’s “DEPORTATION” FROM MEXICO

Reiner Fuellmich had traveled to England to interview a former British Secret service agent.

Upon his return to the United States, he was denied entry, no doubt due to his activities exposing the true nature of the COVID emergency measures.

Denied entry into the U.S., Fuellmich and his wife went to Mexico where they remained for a few months while attempting to resolve the many problems which had arisen.

As they had lost their passports, they applied for new ones and were instructed by the German embassy to go to Tijuana to pick up the new passports.

Seeing as how the embassy was closed for remodeling, Fuellmich and his wife were told to go to directly to the airport to pick up their new passports.

Once at the airport, the Mexican police took Reiner Fuellmich into custody with the excuse that he did not have a valid passport/visa. He was then put on a flight (paid for by the German government!) to Frankfurt, where he was arrested and told that a European arrest warrant was pending on him.

Strangely, his wife –who allegedly had the same problem with her travel documents-- after having spent the night in jail, was released and allowed to remain in Mexico, where she is to this day.

As it ends up, there was NO international arrest warrant, NOR any formal extradition process in place. This means that Fuellmich was abducted under false pretenses.

A week after his arrest in Frankfurt, Fuellmich was transported to the maximum-security prison in Rosdorf, where he remains even today in custody.

All motions to have him released on bail were rejected.

In the past 11 months or so, there have already been 28 hearings, and in each one of these some startling and baffling facts have come out about what is going on.

Of the initial 18 charges made against Fuellmich, only one remains: that regarding the personal loans. The judge, Carsten Schindler, decided that he DOES NOT CONSIDER them to be personal loans, despite the written and signed contracts.

In fact, judge Schindler considers these loans to be fictitious loans and, on May 3 he announced that for him the facts were already clear; that Reiner Fuellmich had acted in bad faith and had embezzled those funds.

He also stated that he intended to convict Fuellmich at all costs, and that there was no need to hear the testimony of any other witnesses for the defense.

His conclusions are based almost exclusively on the inconsistent testimony of Viviane Fischer.

It is important to note that, up to that point, the witnesses allowed to testify were almost exclusively those of the prosecution.

However, the key witness, namely Marcel Templin --one of Fuellmich's accusers!-- into whose bank account the money from the sale of Fuellmich’s home ended up—WAS NOT CALLED TO TESTIFY!

The defense, stunned by these statements made by Judge Schlinder, requested a stay of proceedings and was given time until June 10 to bring forth further evidence and witnesses.

Another very important thing to mention is that one of Fuellmich's defense lawyers, Dr. Christof Miseré, had come into possession of a dossier of the German secret services, in which it is clearly stated that Fuellmich must be stopped at all costs and in every possible manner, and that this must be accomplished by “INFILTRATING PEOPLE AMONGST HIS CLOSEST COLLABORATORS” !

It was also their stated objective to convict Fuellmich in order to prevent him from seeking public / political office in the future.

This dossier, given to Miseré by a whistleblower, demonstrates that Reiner Fuellmich was already under special surveillance as far back as 2021.

Obviously, the prosecutors as well as the judge do not believe that this dossier is real.

It should also be mentioned that there is a whole series of evidence (e-mails, written by the young public prosecutor John) which speak of the “dirty job” done behind Fuellmich's back by his accusers.

“The court's statements sound like a prefabricated declaration by an entity similar to the Stasi (former West Germany secret police), without any legal dogmatic basis.

The most legally pathetic proceedings of the last 30 years”

Statement of Christof Miserè, lawyer of Reiner Fuellmich dated 18th May 2024

Coincidentally, this same prosecutor John was later transferred from Hanover to Göttingen, after the then-prosecutor in Göttingen, who had been asked to investigate Fuellmich, HAD CLEARLY STATED THAT THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT BASIS FOR INVESTIGATING REINER FUELLMICH!

VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN PRISON

SCANDALOUS EVENTS TAKING PLACE in ROSDORF PRISON from May 2024 to date.

May 5 was Reiner Fuellmich's birthday and, to convey support for him, a celebration (authorized) was organized in his honour, right in front of the prison entrance.

Supporters and participants were told that Fuellmich would have his daily hour of outdoor activity between 1:30 and 2:30 p.m. At that hour, the group of supporters played music and sang in order that Fuellmich would hear them from the courtyard and be made aware of their presence.

Indeed, a voice shouting “freedom” was heard from the courtyard, and Fuellmich’s supporters were overjoyed.

It was only the following Monday that it came to be known that, immediately following the hearing the previous Friday, Fuellmich had been denied his hour of outdoor activity and was taken to a different prison cell, and put in solitary confinement.

He spent the entire weekend in solitary confinement and was prohibited from contacting his lawyers, which clearly is against German law and human rights of detainees.

He was also prohibited from contacting his wife.

This punishment was justified by an alleged (anonymous) “tip” that Reiner was recording audio messages to be sent outside the prison.

His jail cell was searched from top to bottom, with the use of dogs, looking for a mobile phone or a recorder!

It should be noted that Fuellmich had permission from the judge to record phone messages as early as November 2023!

Here is a short message from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, dated May 10, about what happened on the weekend of his birthday:

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/1357 (The video link is in Telegram)

Personal note:

If, at the beginning of the proceedings, there was still hope that this trial would be conducted justly and fairly, that hope vanished for good on May 3!

Here is another short statement from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, dated May 28, regarding the situation of the trial:

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/1393 (The video link is in Telegram)

(The video link is in Telegram and I do not have a way of saving them in a different format)

OTHER RELEVANT EVENTS

From June 10, Reiner Fuellmich is escorted by armed security officers in armored vehicles from the prison to the court and back.

In addition to handcuffs attached to a belt, he is also put in ankle shackles and asked to wear a bulletproof vest (the latter of which he declines to wear).

It was also aggressively requested of him to give a blood sample, for a purported case of tuberculosis in the prison.

Fuellmich steadfastly refused to be injected by needle or to undergo any medical procedure for any purpose.

At this point, the defense filed a motion of objection against Judge Schindler, asking that he be removed from the case and replaced, given his blatant bias.

As could be expected, the motion was rejected.

On June 11 Reiner Fuellmich was once again put in solitary confinement, where he remains to this day.

He is not allowed to have any contact with fellow inmates. The stated reason for this measure was that Fuellmich, in conversing with this fellow inmates, was giving them legal tips, something his incarcerators could not tolerate.

He is forced to eat alone, spends his free time outdoors (1 hour/day) in complete solitude, is not permitted to use the gymnasium and can only use the telephone when the other inmates have returned to their cells.

Here is another statement from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, dated June 12, on the topic of the latest on goings in the proceedings against him as well as on current world events:

https://t.me/bitteltv/26837 (The video link is in Telegram)

Here is a short statement from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, dated June 29, on his current situation:

https://t.me/bitteltv/26984 (The video link is in Telegram)

On June 20, it was believed that Judge Schindler and the panel of judges had planned on concluding the trial, but their attempt to do so was thwarted by the intentional absence of Fuellmich’s defense lawyers.

On July 10, Judge Schindler, given the failed attempt to conclude the trial three weeks earlier, assigned Reiner Fuellmich an additional public defender, Tobias Pohl.

Defense lawyer Katja Wörmer filed a new application for a review of Fuellmich’s detention, demanding an immediate halt of the proceedings and the release of Reiner Fuellmich.

On July 19, judge Schindler decided that future hearings, rather than being conducted verbally, must be conducted in written form, thereby violating the basic principles of transparency of public legal proceedings.

The defense, claiming this motion unjust and illegal, once again filed a motion of objection against the entire panel of judges.

Requests of the defense to hear those witnesses named in the original indictment and subpoena, to question the prosecutor, and to question additional witnesses were also all rejected by the court.

The court justified this refusal by stating that any further testimony by witnesses was irrelevant to the clarification of the facts or of the sentence.

Personal note:

IS THE SENTENCE ALREADY DECIDED???

Here is a statement from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, dated July 24, with a clear message:

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/1518 (The video link is in Telegram)

On July 31 Reiner Fuellmich filed a new motion of objection against the judge and the entire panel of judges due to the persistence of the proceedings being held in “written” instead of oral format.

After almost three months, two defense witnesses were finally admitted.

Here is a statement from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, dated August 5, on the ongoing process and current world events:

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/1537 (The video link is in Telegram)

On August 6 a new request was made to put Viviane Fischer on the witness stand, but the court rejected this request.

The defense, having asked that the motivations for the rejections of the motions presented be made known, was told by the court that those motivations would be made known at the time of the verdict, thus making it impossible for the defense to address those motivations while the trial is still ongoing.

This procedure is unfair and illegal.

Reiner Fuellmich, once again, filed a motion of objection against the entire panel of judges regarding the order to conduct the proceedings in "written" form instead of verbally.

Here is a statement from Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, dated August 19, on current world events and the situation in Göttingen:

https://t.me/ReinerFuellmichEnglish/1548 (The video link is in Telegram)

On August 23, Prof. Dr. Martin Schwab (lawyer, advisor of the Corona Committee) was allowed to testify. He confirmed that the personal loans were indeed backed by valid loan agreements, and that Reiner Fuellmich had also made known from the start that the funds were put into his real estate property for the sole purpose of keeping them secure.

Furthermore, Schwab confirmed that Fuellmich had always intended to return this money to the Corona Committee, as soon as his home was sold.

"ON THE BASIS OF THIS TESTIMONY, LAWYER REINER FUELLMICH SHOULD BE RELEASED IMMEDIATELY". - defense lawyer Dr. Christof Miseré.

On August 28 an additional attorney joined the defense team: lawyer Edgar Siemund, expert in corporate law.

Unexpectedly, with the trial still underway and evidence for the defense yet to be presented, the judge instructed the prosecution to make its closing statement.

The prosecution has asked for a guilty sentence, with 3 years and 9 months of detention for Fuellmich.

On August 30 two more defense witnesses were finally heard.

The first testimony showed that:

· Viviane Fischer and Reiner Fuellmich both wanted to secure the funds from the donations;

· Viviane Fischer knew that the group of accusers wanted to sue both herself and Fuellmich, which is why she quickly repaid her part of the loan, three weeks before the impending lawsuit.

· Viviane Fischer knew that Fuellmich's money would be invested in his real estate.

· Viviane Fischer never had any doubt that Fuellmich would pay back the €700,000 to the Corona Committee.

The second witness, a lawyer who worked at Fuellmich's law firm for many years, confirmed that:

· Reiner Fuellmich had already intended to sell his property in Göttingen, and that the money generated from the sale was to be used to repay the loan;

· Fuellmich intended to continue working in his law firm even after the sale of the property.

Personal note:

The insinuations that Fuellmich wanted to sell everything to flee to Mexico with the money are unfounded and utterly ridiculous!

CONCLUSION

· The deportation of Reiner Fuellmich from Mexico was disguised as a legal extradition. It was not;

· Fuellmich has been in solitary confinement since June 11, for an accusation which is the equivalent of a misdemeanor.

· All trial motions presented by the defense, with few exceptions, are continually rejected and the motivation for those rejections will not be made known until the time of sentencing.

· Proceedings conducted in written form is a violation of the principle of transparency in a public trial and of the defendant's right to be heard.

· All motions of objection against the judge and the entire panel of judges are continually rejected.

· REINER FUELLMICH HAS BEEN IN PRE-TRIAL DETENTION FOR NEARLY 11 MONTHS. The maximum length of pre-trial detention in Germany is 6 months!