Chossidmom's Spam Thread of Covid Vaccine Info - welcome

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Fri, Oct 07 2022, 2:03 am

Reproduction Disrupted
From Conception to Lactation

Etana Hecht
Oct 6

Mr. Steve Kirsch’s weekly VSRF show on Rumble VSRF on Rumble is a great resource for information and a recap of important news from the week. This week in particular featured a subject that’s managed to leak out into the mainstream, with Dr. Naomi Wolf and Dr. James Thorp as guests. With so much new information being thrown at us on a daily basis, here’s a breakdown of what’s been discovered regarding the Covid vaccine and its effect on different aspects of the reproductive system as it stands today, according to the above-mentioned professionals and others.

Link to Video: https://rumble.com/v1lo0l3-pre......html

The First Pregnancy Study
Mr. Kirsch began the conversation by mentioning that there had been a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine that the CDC relied on to determine the safety of the Covid vaccines during pregnancy. The study, performed by Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, began back in Dec 2020 and ran through Feb 2021.

Though they did not have the data or the time necessary to be able to confirm safety in vaccination, they declared that there was no signal to be found regarding adverse event rates in pregnant women, yet more follow-up was necessary.

Dr. Wolf responded to the mention of this study by saying that every layer that gets uncovered in this mess exposes greater levels of crimes against humanity. What’s unfolding among pregnant women and their babies is the ultimate crime, aimed at humanity itself. As for the study, it was based partly on V-SAFE data, which is a reporting system that was put into place for people who chose to enroll and report on side effects after a Covid vaccine. Dr. Wolf notes numerous factors that manipulated the data into the desired outcome by those who designed the study and the reporting system, thus allowing the CDC to declare the vaccine safe for pregnant women, even today.

V-SAFE is a phone app that relies on self-reporting. A woman who suffers a miscarriage or negative symptoms during pregnancy post-vaccination is expected to self-report on this app.

Most reports came in from people who were somewhat tech-savvy, and many in the medical field. The entire setup of the system automatically excludes a segment of the population that wouldn’t know to report, or how to report.

Even with the low reporting rate, they concluded there was a 12% miscarriage rate, yet did not disclose the breakdown of gestational age.

A Midwestern Doctor did a detailed breakdown of the faults in the V-SAFE data and design.

"The Forgotten Side of Medicine
We Now Have Clear Proof the Vaccine is Dangerous and That The CDC Concealed It
Aaron Siri was finally able to force the CDC to relinquish their V-safe data, which showed over 10% of recipients suffered significant adverse reactions to vaccination. This article will explain why that is so important.
One of the major challenges with the COVID-19 vaccination has been that it has been impossible to get any clear safety data on it. The two key issues have been:

Suppression of Data Showing The Vaccines Were Not Safe:
•Clinical trials of the vaccines were for all practical purposes fraudulent and massively underreporting adverse events.
•Many of the adverse event databases are not being reported by the government unless they are anonymously leaked by a whistleblower (e.g. here, here or here) or forced into the open by a lawsuit.
•Mass censorship of reporting “unsafe” adverse responses to vaccination on every media platform.

For example, it was recently revealed that the Israeli government deliberately concealed concerning signs of vaccine safety so that it could push the vaccine through. Given that Israel’s government served as Pfizer’s laboratory for their vaccine, this was of immense consequence globally as governments around the world pushed the vaccine forward on the basis of Pfizer’s fraudulent safety data. Steve Kirsch also has been able to demonstrate that the CDC’s committee that determines the appropriateness of these vaccines is willfully ignoring this data.

Design Flaws in the Existing Adverse Event Reporting Systems:
•Massive underreporting occurring globally within the existing vaccine safety monitoring systems (e.g. VAERS).
•It being impossible to know the denominator (how many total people were the adverse reactions observed in) to calculate the actual adverse event rate that is occurring.
•Since VAERS is a passive reporting system, it is “not possible” to determine causality from it.

Because of this, VAERS has been able to demonstrate that the COVID-19 vaccine is much more dangerous that any previous vaccination, but nothing has been done with its data because it is not “reliable.”

VAERS thus occupies a curious position. It is repeatedly cited when it is needed (e.g. to fulfill the required pharmacovigilance role for the FDA) but disparaged as worthless whenever its data is cited to suggest potential harm from vaccination. Many have recognized the shortcomings in VAERS, and attempts have been made to produce more reliable systems, however as these systems tend to then produce evidence vaccines are in fact quite harmful, they are then scrapped (e.g. the ESP:VAERS project).

V-Safe
Due to the unprecedented nature of the “emergency” COVID-19 vaccination campaign (a completely novel vaccine was developed in one tenth of the time normally required for the basic safety testing to bring a vaccine to market and then forced onto the entire world), a significant amount of the safety testing had to be performed after the vaccine had already been given to the world’s population.

I cannot find direct proof of this, but I am relatively certain that it was decided that since the vaccine had to be tested on the general population and no existing mechanism existed to effectively track vaccine safety, V-Safe was developed to fulfill this role.

V-Safe briefly was a phone app aggressively marketed to the initial recipients of the vaccine (e.g. healthcare workers who could be expected to be reliable reporters of adverse events) were given and instructed to use to communicate to report their experiences. This approach is very important because this data was prospective (this data is always more reliable than retrospective data and considered necessary to demonstrate causality) and because the total number of participants was known (which is necessary to demonstrate the rate at which adverse events occurred). The CDC was also supposed to follow up with individuals who reported adverse events, although I am somewhat doubtful this occurred (e.g. one reader here who was hospitalized by a blood clot’s follow-up consisted of being instructed to report the event to VAERS).

Here are some brief descriptions of V-Safe (source is in picture):

Not surprisingly, V-safe’s data was never made available to the public, with the CDC giving the excuse that they needed to anonymize the data in order to protect patient confidentiality so that releasing the data could be stalled out indefinitely. To any astute observer, this is a clear admission of the data within V-safe was very concerning as the CDC could not afford to publicly release it (the federal government will always try to come up with excuses to indefinitely stall on releasing incriminating data best shown with the FDA demanding decades to curate and release Pfizer’s documents).

Fortunately, Aaron Siri, an attorney who has spent years fighting for vaccine safety on behalf of ICAN and Del Bigtree, after 463 days of work was finally able to force the CDC to release the V-Safe data. Given how concerning this data this raises serious concerns on who decided it was appropriate to withhold that data from the public. Interestingly, a key argument the CDC used to avoid releasing the data was the time they needed to develop a software system that could analyze and present the data, yet ICAN was able to do so within a day of receiving the day.

V-Safe’s Data
V-Safe collected two forms of data, relatively generic responses on the effects of vaccination (this is why it was not suited to detect rare significant side effects of vaccination) and free form responses on complex side effects that were experienced. Presently, only the former has been made available. At some point in the future, the latter will be made available and will likely be able to paint the best picture possible of the severe side effects that the vaccines have created. Nonetheless with the former, there is still a lot of extremely concerning data which I believe indicts the COVID-19 vaccines as the most harmful vaccinations in history.

Of the 10,108,273 users who participated in V-Safe the following was found (you can review the data yourself here, keep in mind there will always be a degree of underreporting that occurs as many readers here noted V-safe was remarkably difficult to enter adverse events into):
•1,225,867 (12.13%) were unable to perform their normal activities.
•1,344,330 (13.3%) missed work or school.
•782,913 (7.7%) required medical care, on average 2.7 times.

This is really bad.

Other notes on the above data:
•The last datapoint does not distinguish what type of care was needed (seeing their doctor verses going to the ICU), although from the anecdotal reports I have reviewed over the last two years, multiple doctor visits often suggests eventually needing to go to a hospital or having chronic complications from the vaccination.
•Keep in mind that approximately 264 million people in the United States received this vaccine, so a 10% adverse event rate from vaccination appears to outweigh even the most extreme estimates of harm from COVID-19 (not to mention the vaccine increases rather than decreases your likelihood of getting COVID-19). This is important because with almost every vaccine, the risk of you having an adverse reaction to a vaccine is never compared to your risk of getting the disease times the chance the vaccine will prevent you from getting the disease times the likelihood the disease itself will produce serious complications following an infection. However, with a 10% adverse event rate, the absurdity of this calculation becomes much easier to grasp.
•V-safe’s data showed that women were significantly more likely to report adverse events than men Although reporting factors could potentially explain some of this, it is congruent with many other datasets researchers that show women overall are 2-3 times more vulnerable to side effects of this vaccine (besides myocarditis which disproportionately affects men).
•Finally I was unable to determine how many people had at least one of these three happen to them, but it was likely at least 15%.

A variety of common symptoms after vaccination were also evaluated by v-safe. Based on the current presentation of the data, I cannot provide a clear estimate of how many people were affected by the symptoms, but it is noteworthy that many of the symptoms v-safe classified as “severe” which were reported by hundreds of thousands of people, while clearly problematic, in the grand scheme of vaccine injuries are not that severe. A very common tactic the pharmaceutical industry uses to conceal adverse events in clinical trials is to make it not possible for test subjects to report those adverse events. This was reported by participants in the COVID-19 vaccine trials and also by many individuals in this article’s comment section who used V-safe.

All of this likely means that once the freeform data is available it was entered into the V-safe, the picture we presently have of the vaccine injuries will be much worse than the damning picture that has already been made available through ICAN’s lawsuit. A common way that pharmaceutical companies conceal adverse reactions to their products is to not make those adverse reactions be possible for trial participants to select and document as a reaction (COVID vaccine trial participants have also testified that this happened), and based on the responses that were available in V-safe, it is clear the same also occurred there.

This is why the designers emphasized V-safe would not be suited for discovering "rare” or “unexpected” reactions to vaccinations (which is a euphemism for the much more severe complications of vaccination). Additionally, it should make sense why the most severe effects like death are unlikely to end up in this data set as those individuals will no longer be able to enter them into their V-safe app.

Ten million people being actively monitored constitutes to my knowledge the largest clinical trial in history. Additionally, it should also be noted that by May the CDC had stopped promoting this system and its usage dropped off dramatically. In my eyes this suggests that once they realized how concerning the data was, they stopped trying to collect it, and that it was not initially expected that the vaccine would be as harmful as it was.

What Can We Learn From This Data?
•First off, this shows us that the CDC and the FDA have clearly failed in their duty to assess the safety of the COVID-19 vaccines and certain individuals need to be held accountable. Given that many laws and policies have been predicated upon those agencies doing this, this gives potential grounds to repeal many policies such as the recently passed law in California which penalize doctors from suggesting anything with vaccines is unsafe.

•Secondly, this at long last provides us with a means for determining the VAERS under-reporting factor (which I am sure will be done in the next few days). Determining this under reporting factor is immensely important because while many extremely concerning vaccine injuries and deaths have been reported in VAERS, we also know that they only represent the tip of the iceberg and that there are far more injuries occurring than those that can be found within VAERS.

•This is the first large dataset I have come across (besides the Israeli study demonstrating significant adverse reactions from the boosters) that appears to be congruent with what I have directly observed. One of the major issues with science is that it trains you to deny your personal observations and assume that they are a product of bias, rather than questioning if the research you were relying upon is corrupt. I have felt the discrepancy between what I am personally observing and the effects that I have observed from the vaccinations (e.g. I know of approximately 50 people who died), indicates that the adverse event reporting data is deliberately under reporting the adverse events.

Recently, I discussed evidence that vaccinations were causing a massive spike in disability (which is sadly one of the very common results of medical injuries). With that dataset, I suspected that there would continue to be an upward trend in the disabilities from the time that they were first identified to now (as many of the effects from vaccination are chronic and worsen over time), but the rate of increase would level off as a result of individuals declining further vaccination (which fortunately has happened, in a state without mandates, only 1 in 573 people has accepted the most recent booster).

I wanted to wait longer before reviewing the subject so there would be more time for the data to prove or disprove my hypothesized trend. However, since the areas that V-safe was monitoring for are similar to what the national disability survey assessed, I think it is important to observe how these two data sets overlap (there was an approximately 10% increase in the disability rate when the vaccine rollout occurred and between 12-13% of those who received a vaccine were unable to work or do normal activities for an unspecified period of time).

At the time the previous article was published, the data was as follows:

Presently the data is as follows:

There is a lot that still cannot be determined from the V-safe data until it is correlated with VAERS and the additional free form text responses are made available (this is where most of the severe injuries will be made evident). However, in my assessment, this data clearly shows the CDC and FDA were fully aware this vaccine was significantly more dangerous than any other vaccine on the market and unlike the other systems, since this system was specifically designed to answer that question there is no way for them to argue otherwise. For those interested, Steve Kirsch has provided a more detailed summary demonstrating the CDC is deliberately ignoring evidence of safety issues from these vaccines.

Conclusion
We owe the individuals who put forth the work to make this information available to the public a debt of gratitude. The information within V-safe will be a game changer in shifting the public debate on the vaccine program. It must also be noted that there is still much more to be determined from this data and we should be cautious on making claims about it before the entire picture (and the most concerning data found within the free-form responses) is made available to the public.

The most important point to take home with all of this was that V-safe was specifically designed to be able to answer questions about the safety of these vaccines that could not be conclusively determined with other methods like VAERS. The fact that the CDC and FDA then stonewalled making that data available to the public clearly proves malfeasance by these agencies and demands a congressional investigation.

Additionally, although many recent events have made the American people lose faith within the justice system, many of the successful lawsuits (like this one) that have been passed against the Biden administration's COVID-19 vaccine policies show that the courts can still serve a vital role in protecting our constitutional freedoms if the legal system is approached appropriately. Please consider sharing this article with the appropriate parties (e.g. on Gab or GETTR) because this is a message that can shift the narrative if it gets out, but please also be mindful to avoid claiming anything that is not yet demonstrated within this data.

Thanks for reading The Forgotten Side of Medicine! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

Lastly, for those who would like to know about this subject, Steve Kirsch is compiling an evolving summary of it here:

Steve Kirsch's newsletter
Why did the CDC hide the V-safe data from the American people for almost 2 years?
Executive summary V-safe is a voluntary safety monitoring program put in place by the CDC to monitor adverse reactions after people take a vaccine. The V-safe data shows that 33.1% of the people who got the vaccine suffered from a significant adverse event and 7.7% had to seek professional medical care. These are extraordinary numbers. They clearly show …
Read more"

Interestingly, on October 14, 2021, there was a correction added to the NEJM study, in tiny wording, with the smallest hyperlink possible. In that correction, it’s stated that gestational age was not included in the study and that due to the time limits and the nature of the study, “no denominator was available to calculate a risk estimate for spontaneous abortions”.

Lies
Declaring the vaccine safe for pregnant women based on the faulty study relied upon by the CDC back in early 2021 was a lie. Continuing to declare the vaccine safe for pregnant women and their babies is still a lie, and it becomes more egregious with each day that passes. Included in the lies is the statement that the mRNA, spike protein, and lipid nanoparticles that make up the shot stay in the arm at the injection site. Dr. Robert Chandler of the DailyClout/Warroom volunteers has discovered evidence in the Pfizer documents that the vaccine ingredients do NOT stay at the injection site, but cross every membrane in the body, and gather in multiple organs with a high concentration in the ovaries. They also cross the placenta which may explain the unusual presentation of damaged placentas in vaccinated women that’s been observed by Dr. James Thorp.

Dr. Robert Chandler of the DailyClout did an extremely thorough breakdown of the Shimabukuro paper which I recommend reading in full to understand the depth of the lies and manipulation. Here are ten important conclusions he came to, with each part fully explained within his report.

Link to Report: https://dailyclout.io/data-do-.....omen/

Vaccinated Mother’s Milk
Back in May, the DailyClout broke the news that there was evidence of breastmilk being affected by the Covid vaccine, and yet again, that evidence includes the fact that Pfizer and the FDA knew that this was the case while encouraging vaccines and mandates for pregnant women. (From Pfizer’s post-marketing experience, reissued in April 2022 - page 12/13)

One of the lipids in the Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) contains polyethylene glycol (PEG) which enters the breastmilk through the bloodstream and lymph nodes. The Pfizer documents include cases in which four women’s breastmilk turned blue-green, and one of their babies had seizures and died after nursing post-vaccination. Polyethylene glycol is toxic and not meant to be ingested in the bodies of anyone, let alone infants.

Confirmation from Israel
Ranit Feinberg corroborated the above findings by studying VAERS reports of injured babies from vaccinated mothers. She found 648 cases, with many of those babies reported as having died within two weeks of the vaccination of their mothers. Some other symptoms found in VAERS reports of babies injured by nursing from vaccinated mothers include:

Neurological symptoms

Narcoleptic symptoms

Febrile syndromes

Organ damage

Brain damage

Link to Ranit’s Report: https://rtmag.co.il/english/64.....email

They Begrudgingly Admit Harm
While the media and public health agencies completely ignored the findings of the DailyClout team back in May, we’re now in Fall 2022, and while it feels frustratingly slow, the information machine cannot be stopped. Last week, the Journal of the American Medical Association published a report confirming that mRNA is found in breast milk.

This is also the first high-profile report that admits what Pfizer knew back in 2020- that there is biodistribution of the vaccine ingredients throughout the entire body, contrary to what the world was told.

Though they stopped short of recognizing the danger of vaccinating mothers altogether, and simply recommended that women refrain from breastfeeding for two days after vaccination, the high-profile confirmation of DailyClout’s findings is a bombshell that should be making headlines across the nation. Dr. Wolf pointed out that JAMA's conclusion that breastfeeding moms should wait two days before nursing is dangerous to women and babies since one of the reports of a dead baby in the VAERS database died at fourteen days after the mother’s vaccination.

Rachelle Walensky is Responsible
The Shimbakuru paper that was commissioned by the CDC began in 2020, as the vaccine rollout began, and lasted for 3-4 months. To Dr. Wolf’s knowledge, there has not been any follow-up to that study. That study did not prove that the vaccine was safe for pregnant women, yet Rachelle Walensky signed off on it and sent spokespeople everywhere to promote it, and even mandate it for pregnant women.

Dr. Wolf is currently in the process of suing Twitter for colluding with the CDC via email to deplatform her and turn her life upside down, simply for raising the questions that we now have the answers to.

To conclude the segment, Dr. Wolf explained that the mountain of information we have accessible to us now shows a 360-degree attack on human reproduction. Thanks to the professional work of Amy Kelly and the DailyClout/Warroom team, we now know that the Covid vaccine negatively affects every step of human reproduction from conception through lactation.

Dr. James Thorp
Dr. James Thorp continued the conversation with Mr. Kirsch and stated that he completely supports Dr. Wolf’s reporting, based on his own research and datasets.

Dr. Thorp is an OBGYN, and he’s one of the rare doctors who managed to change his mind and publicly change course about vaccines overall back in 2010 with a focus on pregnant and lactating women, as is his expertise. In fact, he was so concerned about project warp speed and the lack of research that he personally designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that he published on social media in September of 2020 and sent it to Trump, Gates, & Fauci demanding a 10 year blinded trial prior to closing the study. Over the course of the Covid vaccine rollout, Dr. Thorp collected evidence that challenges the safety of the Covid vaccines in pregnant women. When he tried to present his findings to the public health agencies, he encountered a response that he’d never been subjected to in his entire career- threats of license removal. Any respect Dr. Thorp had for doctors, pastors, and community leaders is gone. The Dept of HHS distributed tens of billions of dollars across medical, religious, and social institutions for them to push the shots on their communities. For the first time in history, he was told to stay silent on his findings, or risk his license.

Dr. Thorp said that there are hierarchal layers of cognitive dissonance, which have formed an atmosphere that became riddled with patient betrayal, corruption of healthcare, removal of informed consent, and the destruction of the patient-physician relationship. This has been the largest deception in the history of the world.

Dr. Thorp is declaring a complete moratorium on Covid-19 vaccines on any pregnant and breastfeeding women. He’s DEMANDING that vaccines in pregnancies be stopped immediately, and he has the data to back up that demand.

Dr. Thorp along with other doctors, including Dr. Peter McCullough, released a brand new pre-print study on Covid vaccines and their impact on pregnancy outcomes and menstrual function. The study was based on CDC VAERS data, and compared outcomes in pregnant women between the influenza vaccine dating back to 1998, and the Covid vaccine in the last two years. They studied all adverse events related to pregnancy and menstruation and found a definitive significant increase of adverse events from the Covid vaccine compared with the flu vaccine.

Dr. Thorp mentioned a long list of other sources whose data indicates Covid-19 vaccine injury.

Some highlights from the “Discussion” section towards the end of the study include:

Adverse event reports for Covid vaccines are in excess of those for the Flu vaccine by more than a factor of two. According to the CDC, a factor of two or greater IS a safety signal that requires further investigation.

Other large global vaccine reporting systems that indicate high rates of vaccine injury include:

UK Yellow Card System

WHO VigiAccess

European Economic Area’s EudraVigilance Data

Major governments and organizations that have already called for a halt on vaccinating pregnant women include:

UK Govt

World Council of Health

Producers of the Covid vaccine themselves report serious Adverse Events in the first 90 days post-vaccination in pregnant women including:

46% (124/270) of pregnant women experienced adverse events

81% (26/32) experienced miscarriage (This refers to women who got vaccinated in the first trimester)

The vaccine contents get biodistributed throughout the body and cross the blood-brain barriers in both the mother and the fetus.

In the first 15 months after the vaccine rollout began, 1,366 peer-reviewed reports have been published that document severe adverse events after Covid vaccination.

Link to Pre-Print: https://www.preprints.org/manu.....30/v1
Male Reproductive Harm
Amy Kelly of the DailyClout has done a deep dive into the Pfizer documents to investigate the effects of the Covid-19 vaccine on the male side of fertility. Unfortunately, there’s more bad news on that front.

Behind the FDA Curtain: War Room/DailyClout Pfizer Reports
Pfizer, FDA, CDC Hid Proven Harms to Male Sperm Quality, Testes Function, from mRNA Vaccine Ingredients
When the COVID-19 vaccine rollout to the public began in late 2020, medical professionals, public health agencies, and government spokespeople all assured the American public that the novel mRNA vaccines did not cause negative systematic effects to human bodies. They promised the public, many of whom were skeptical about the safety of a drug brought to …
Read more
a month ago · 204 likes · 53 comments · Amy Kelly
Pfizer’s own protocol demonstrates that they knew that there could be harm to reproduction from the male side, and forbade trial participants from participating in unprotected intercourse for the duration of the trial.

Ms. Kelly appeared on Warroom to explain the findings and she did a great job giving over plenty of information.

Link to Video: https://rumble.com/v1mhy5s-amy......html

Fertility Issues
The conversations above covered a lot of ground in terms of what we know so far regarding Covid-19 vaccines and fertility, and yet it’s still just a drop in the bucket and the beginning of a long process. Here are some other important links to look through that round out the picture and pursue other related threads:

Dr. Naomi Wolf’s latest Substack is packed with information that she and her team have gathered so far.

Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf
Destroying Women, Poisoning Breast Milk, Murdering Babies; and Hiding the Truth
The worst that can happen to the human species, is happening. The War Room/DailyClout’s Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers — a group of medical and scientific experts who have selflessly stepped up to analyze the tens of thousands of formerly internal Pfizer documents released under court order subsequent to a lawsuit by Aaron Siri’s firm, Siri & Glim…
Read more

Mrs. Brucha Weisberger’s latest Substack discusses reports by Igor Chudov on the damaged lungs of a fetus whose mother had been vaccinated, and the claim by health authorities that MIS-N is caused by Covid as opposed to the vaccine.

In G-d’s Army There’s Only Truth https://truth613.substack.com/.....nancy
They TOLD you it was safe in pregnancy and nursing…and then the horror show began. Part 1 - Newborn Lung Damage
BS”D The stories of miscarriage and fetal death after maternal covid vaccination, and of newborns who are not doing well, have become a numbing, tragic deluge. I have heard so many personal stories that I lost track. In fact, it appears likely that babies can be hurt by the vaccination of the…
Read more

BBC News reports that Scotland will be launching an investigation into two spikes in newborn baby deaths that have occurred since the vaccine rollout. Newborn baby deaths in Scotland are currently at the highest levels they’ve been at in 10 years.

Comedian Jimmy Dore is himself vaccine-injured, and he’s done a good job covering vaccine-related updates. He recently discussed the JAMA article.

Dr. Wolf and Amy Kelly held an hour-long discussion going over the information from the DailyClout team.

Where we go from here remains to be seen. What’s certain is that the team of warriors relentlessly discovering and sharing information will not be deterred.

My Notes- CDC Employees are Drones
Every so often, after a particularly heartbreaking set of reading and writing, I feel the need to demand an explanation. I called the CDC Covid vaccine hotline and spoke to one of their call center employees. She followed the script to a T, although based on the long pauses after my questions, I definitely threw her off a bit. I started by asking what their stance is on Covid vaccines in pregnant women. I let her read off the entire script with the official line of “safe and effective, Covid is dangerous for pregnant women” (oh wait, sorry- she was very careful to say “pregnant people” the entire time), and stayed quiet until the end.

Once she finished, I told her that the Journal of American Medical Association just put out a study proving that the vaccine contents enter the breastmilk, as well as settle in the ovaries. I said that based on what we now know, it’s very concerning to me that the CDC is still recommending the vaccine to pregnant women, especially when other countries are starting to backpedal away from that. I asked her if there has been a follow-up to the study that the CDC originally based its recommendations on.

There was definitely a stunned silence, but eventually, she managed to say that all she can do for me is pass along my official complaint to CDC officials. I accepted her offer and then told her that many people inside big organizations are starting to emerge as whistleblowers. I told her that if she’d like to become a whistleblower, she should please email me.

More stunned silence, then asked if there was anything else she could do, and we ended the call. If we annoy them often enough, maybe we’ll strike gold.

amother

Dustypink

Fri, Oct 07 2022, 2:12 am

The previous parts are available on Dangerous Docs https://dangerousdocs.substack.com/ and on my site beginning with part one here https://chananyaweissman.com/a.....=471. We did the hard work of bringing this information to the community, which the fake, sold-out Jewish media failed to do and continues to ignore. Now the ball is in your court. What are you going to do?

Moles and Mosrim in Brooklyn – Part Eight
On February 23, 2022 the Boro Park Jewish Community Council (BPJCC) staff and consultant David Rubel presented a “Partner Engagement Plan”, as part of their contractual arrangement with the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH). It is available here. Since they tend to couch their true intentions in buzzwords, euphemisms, and mumbo-jumbo, we will translate from Forked Tongue to plain English.

The BPJCC, who had been awarded more than a million dollars in grants to serve as government moles in the Orthodox Jewish community, planned to “engage” with more than two dozen prominent Jewish organizations, institutions, rabbis, politicians, and businesses to do the government's bidding while pretending to be serving the people. The plan was to collaborate with them to gather intelligence on the community, “target” various populations with government-approved Covid propaganda, and, most of all, convince their trusting constituents to take the accursed Covid shots.

Those being “engaged” were referred to as “stakeholders”, a vague corporate term that essentially refers to those who have a vested interest. The vested interest of those engaged by the BPJCC is not difficult to surmise: financial rewards and the good graces of those in the halls of power.

Conspicuously absent from the list of stakeholders, despite being strongly affected by the decisions being made on their behalf, was the general public. They were instead referred to as “targeted populations”.

Each stakeholder was assigned a “Potential role in the activity”, an “Engagement strategy”, a “Follow-up strategy” for sharing data and lessons learned, a “Priority Population Targeted”, and a level of priority for their activities. We will comment on some items of particular interest.

We must also note that merely being on this list is not evidence that the “stakeholder” in question actually collaborated with the BPJCC. We do know for certain that many of them pushed the Covid agenda – they did so loudly and proudly – but it is quite possible that some of them quietly demurred. The Partner Engagement Plan is just that – a plan.

The first listed stakeholder was Ami Magazine. Although Ami was the only media company mentioned in this document, the BPJCC explicitly mentioned Mishpacha, Wellsprings, and the Flatbush Jewish Journal as potential strategic partners, as discussed in parts 3 and 6 of this series.

The "engagement strategy" for Ami was to "Provide a culturally sensitive and well-respected outlet for the community to gain information as to where to access public health resources. Partner with a writer from our community to put together sensitive public health articles that will speak to this community."

In plain English: Leverage the community's trust in Ami as a “kosher” magazine to spread tailored propaganda (described by the BPJCC as “correct public health information”). This government propaganda would come under the guise of general content from a regular contributor to Ami, who would serve as a covert missionary.

Notice how they always frame their devious, malicious activities as if they are providing a service to the community. If you take their words at face value, the Orthodox Jews in New York simply needed help "to gain information as to where to access public health resources". Really? They had no idea? And they needed an extremely well-funded, covert, deeply insidious government campaign to supply them with this information?

On a certain level, though, it's an impressive feat to get paid not only by those producing propaganda but those receiving it.

The next stakeholder was Bikur Cholim Chesed Organization Guardians of the Sick. They provide disabled people and home-bound seniors with meals. The BPJCC envisioned them delivering those meals with a side of Covid propaganda. Considering the carnage caused by the Covid shots, one wonders if this vulnerable population needs guardians from the guardians.

Rabbi Chaim Dovid Zwiebel, Executive Vice President of Agudath Israel, was the first individual mentioned. His potential role was to “provide backing to the BPJCC's CDG [Covid Disparities Grant] health initiative so that the community can trust in and accept our mission and leadership.” The plan was for Zwiebel to join their advisory committee, and “also send letters to the schools and synagogues endorsing this program”.

Why was this endorsement assumed? On what was it to be based?

If you still believe that “rabbinic endorsements” are the product of rabbis delving into the Torah and a pressing issue without being swayed by outside pressure or a conflict of interest, and arriving at an independent, informed, sincere conclusion, which is then communicated in a way that truly informs and teaches the public, it's high time you woke up and smelled the sewage. It stinks.

The follow-up strategy was for Zwiebel to “attend in-person and virtual monthly meetings and discuss how Agudath Israel will help encourage the community to better take care of their health”.

Quitting smoking, eating a healthy diet, exercising, and getting enough sleep were not what they had in mind. Abstaining from unnecessary, dangerous pharmaceutical products was most definitely not what they had in mind.

The next two individual “stakeholders” were Senator Simcha Felder and Assemblyman Simcha Eichenstein. In the words of the BPJCC, “The community trusts the senator and therefore is more receptive to anything that has his endorsement. Having senator Felder endorse our program to the community will help us a lot”. Eichenstein was to play a similar role.

Both politicians had already been pushing the shots. One example from Felder can be found here. Eichenstein had already collaborated with Hatzalah; see this nauseating bit of propaganda, in which the accursed shots were equated with the splitting of the sea.

JOWMA was on the list, of course. BPJCC would “utilize the existing content from JOWMA” (all of which has since been removed from the JOWMA website, as it aged like fine vinegar). “We will also partner with them for their Podcast and help publicize it. Included in all health messaging will be the JOWMA hotline so that community members can speak to a trained professional at any time regarding their health concerns.” Trained professional medical propagandists, that is.

The next “stakeholder” is another example of how deeply insidious this operation was. “Yad Efraim provides kosher food to families of patients in the hospital...Initial meeting with Yad Efraim on how to use their data to encourage community members to be more COVID-19 mindful so they don't end up where they need to utilize the Yad Efraim's services.”

That sounds almost like a Mafia threat. Better take your Covid shots. You wouldn't want to wind up in the hospital needing Yad Efraim to deliver food to you, would you?

In previous parts, mainly part three, we discussed the plan to infiltrate the yeshivos with Covid and vaccine propaganda in the guise of a science curriculum. This was to begin at stakeholder Bnos Jerusalem of Belz with a trial run. “Upon positive feedback, we will have further meetings to discuss developing a full curriculum and implementing it within this school. We will also discuss if they can refer and endorse the curriculum to other schools.”

We noted that this curriculum would be promoted to other schools via the Yeshiva Principals Association. You might have wondered what this association is. Probably an initiative to unite yeshivos in support of improvements to their yeshiva curriculum, right?

Wrong. As described in a 2017 article about a “Yeshiva Education Expo” organized by the Yeshiva Principals Association, they work “to unite yeshivos in support of improvements to secular curriculum”.

Guess who was the executive director of the Yeshiva Principals Association.

Avi Greenstein. Who also happens to be the President of the Boro Park Jewish Community Council – the very same BPJCC that was partnering with the NYC government to covertly introduce a Covid / vaccine / “science” curriculum in yeshivos all over Brooklyn.

The incestuous web of conflicts of interest is remarkable, and we are surely just scratching the surface.

Rabbi Yaakov Weinfeld of congregation Khal Lev Avrohom is another interesting stakeholder. I have no information regarding whether or not he agreed to participate, but here is how the BPJCC described their plan for him: “Rabbi Weinfeld will join our events as the religious representative and the individual our community looks to for guidance. He will speak on the importance of maintaining one's health within religion.”

Such as by doing whatever the government-approved “experts” say?

Old-timers who were around before 2020 remember when it was standard for rabbinic leaders to study things for themselves, slowly and carefully, and arrive at independent conclusions, which were not necessarily the conclusions desired by the establishment. We looked to certain people for guidance specifically because they were not able to be recruited by the establishment to rubber-stamp their activities and messages – even and especially those that pertained to people's health.

But now rabbis know their place, and they submit to the hand that feeds them.

This brings us to Josh Mehlman. “Mr. Mehlman is the Chairman of the FJCC (Flatbush Jewish Community Coalition). The FJCC has a large association of community rabbis that can be utilized in helping us get religious support for this cause. Mr. Mehlman will join our events as well as get local Rabbinical leaders to join our events in which a well-respected Rabbi will be featured to answer all questions on health questions related to religion.”

Please note that “all questions” did not include questions such as these. We already know their answers were nothing more than rhetoric to take the shots, do what you're told, and stop asking questions. The BPJCC took it for granted that community rabbis would fall into line and endorse their program without a peep of opposition. At no point did they express the slightest reservation that rabbis would challenge anything, or even hesitate to cooperate.

The only way they could be so confident is if the rabbinic establishment was already in the bag, and had proven that over a long period of time. Before you continue, let that sink in.

The Partner Engagement Plan also included carefully selected stores in the community. “Teachers Edition is an arts-n-crafts store in Boro Park. Since they are the main source of school supplies for teachers and students, they can assist in the creation of a curriculum [that] will raise student awareness of public health. Curricula and books about both public and private health for students, as well as resources for teachers to utilize, will be made available to the community through their store.”

Follow-up strategy: “A meeting will be held to determine which resources were well accepted and which ones should be eliminated or revised. The success of this program and the potential for other ones will also be discussed.”

While you were innocently shopping for school supplies, the government's eyes on the ground were tracking you, researching you, and refining their efforts to brainwash you.

Yuck! I'll go buy some Jewish books instead.

“Eichlers is one of the largest Judaica stores in Brooklyn. They will assist us in the dissemination of public health information as well as partner with us for street-level outreach.” The BPJCC would be following up with them as well to collect data and “inform our assessments”.

According to a since-hidden Facebook post by Blimi Marcus, a notorious vaccine extremist waging war on the Orthodox community from within (see here), the owner of Eichler's, Mordy Getz, “paid for trucks to park near an anti-vaccine rally last year and blast warnings from speakers.”

Chaim Fischer was tapped by the BPJCC as a board member of Maimonides Hospital. “He will put out messages to the community in which Maimonides is backing our public health initiative which will give us a large measure of credibility and respect and trust...the BPJCC has gained a massive partner in order to reach the Boro Park community.”

Last but not least, we have Hatzalah, which moonlights as an emergency medical response organization when they aren't busy conducting huge fundraisers and pushing Covid shots. In totally unrelated news, Eli Beer, Founder of United Hatzalah of Israel and President of Friends of United Hatzalah, is buddy-buddy with the World Economic Forum (see here and here).

The WEF believes there are far too many people in the world and the population needs to be culled, among other delightful ideas totally in line with the Torah, while Hatzalah supposedly exists for the singular purpose of saving lives. It would seem to be an odd shidduch – unless one of them is fudging it.

The BPJCC noted Hatzalah as a high-priority stakeholder, though their collaboration on spreading Covid propaganda was strangely understated. “Information on how to prevent having to call Hatzolah, as well as basic first aid information resources provided by Hatzolah, will be distributed to the community by outreach events and through Hatzolah's own organization. Meetings will be held to determine if the amount of information is sufficient to avoid unnecessary accidents, injuries, and illnesses; and whether it would be beneficial to develop more material regarding this topic, will also be discussed.”

That's an odd departure from the topic at hand, no? Suddenly the priority was preventing sprained ankles and burns?

If that were the case, Hatzalah probably wasn't the best address. They were distracted with other things – convincing people to wear masks and take Covid shots, and collecting huge amounts of data on the Orthodox Jewish community to advance these goals.

In June of 2021 they sponsored a study by Nishma Research with the title “COVID-19 Attitudes and Vaccine Sentiment in the U.S. Orthodox Jewish Community: Views Among the Chasidish, Yeshivish, and Modern Orthodox Segments”. The study is available here. There is much there to analyze and discuss, but for now we should take note of a volunteer first-aid and ambulatory service spending its money – money they relentlessly beg for from the community – to sponsor sociological research on Orthodox Jews, broken down into categories, for the purpose of determining how to get more of them to obstruct their breathing with face-coverings and take accursed shots.

So who is more deceptive on their shidduch profile, the World Economic Forum or Hatzalah?

Is it any wonder the BPJCC considered engaging with Hatzalah a high priority?

Here is a complete list of “stakeholders” in the Partner Engagement Plan. Those who rebuffed invitations to participate in the BPJCC's insidious propaganda campaign are urged to come forward and publicly disassociate themselves from it.

Ami Magazine

Bikur Cholim Chesed Organization Guardians of the Sick

Ezra Medical Center

Rabbi Chaim Zwiebel – Executive Vice President of Agudath Israel

Boro Park Y

Senator Simcha Felder

Assemblyman Simcha Eichenstein

Community Board 12 (note: Avi Greenstein is a member there as well)

JOWMA

Toys 4 U

Yad Efraim

Boro Park Y

Joel Rosenfeld, Together We Are

Bnos Jerusalem of Belz

Masbia (here is a video from Alexander Rapaport, Executive Director of Masbia, pushing the measles shots on behalf of the Mayor's office in 2019. Note the institutions that received a shout-out as this incongruous spokesman for healthy living waddles by them: Hatzoloh of Williamsburg, Maimonides Hospital, Yad Ephraim, Refuah Resources, Ezra Medical Center. All part of “the family”.)

Ohel

Rabbi Weinfeld

Teachers Edition

Hatzolah

Misaskim

Chaim Fischer

Eichlers Judaica Religious Articles & Gifts

COPO – Council of Peoples Organizations

COJO Flatbush – Council of Jewish Organizations Flatbush

Josh Mehlman

Considering the depth and scope of the operation targeting the Orthodox Jewish community (and greater society), we must assume this list is not exclusive, but representative of the near-total takeover of our institutions, organizations, schools, community leadership, rabbinic establishment, political representatives, and media.

It's been a full month since this series began. Not one Jewish media agency has picked up the story or even contacted us with an inquiry. Not one Jewish media agency found any of this information remotely interesting, let alone one of the most significant stories of our time.

They will not publish a word about this, because they are all just as guilty of corruption and collaboration. Shining a light on the BPJCC and their various partners would require exposing themselves to very uncomfortable questions as well. So they will ignore it and count on the community to not only continue to do nothing, but continue to trust them and support them.

Are they right?

Or will the community unite, rise up, and finally change the game?

__________________________

chananyaweissman.com/

rumble.com/c/c-782463

Download Tovim Ha-Shenayim as a PDF for free!

If you received this from someone else and want to receive future articles directly, please send a request to endthemadness@gmail.com.