Chossidmom's Spam Thread of Covid Vaccine Info - welcome

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Sun, Aug 21 2022, 1:14 pm

Right now!!!!! Dr. Cole, Dr. James Thorp and more!

🏛🩺 HAVE GOVERNMENT AND MEDICAL ESTABLISHMENT BEEN ACTING IN YOUR BEST INTEREST?
Sunday August 21 1:00 PM EDT
•Dr. Ryan Cole Pathologist •Dr. James Thorp OB •Deborah Conrad Hospital PA
THE EVIDENCE IS IN - THE FDA AND CDC KNOWINGLY CAUSED HARM. MOUNTING TRAGEDIES.
tinyurl.com/TruthSavesLives
Zoom ID: 952 175 3151
Passcode: 1818

gigi

Sun, Aug 21 2022, 1:29 pm

ChossidMom wrote:

I promise you that there was a woman quoted in the Israeli press whose father had passed away and she said that it was a good thing he had been vaccinated - otherwise it could have been worse. (Really? How?)

brainwashing. beautifully done

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Sun, Aug 21 2022, 2:05 pm

My internet connection is very spotty so here is what I have gathered so far, from Dr. Ryan Cole, Pathologist.
You can't measure immunity by number of antibodies. The real measure of immunity is T-Cell activity.
We know that the vax does not prevent the virus. We know that vaccinated have a 5 fold increasefor spreading it. Policy makers are killing hundreds of thousands of people worldwide and the CDC has become a purveyor of false info. They admit that they are not following VAERS or their own data collection system.
This vax has the highest amount of death in one and half years of the va and they still didn't look at their own data!

The FDA authroized the shots as if they were a regular vaccine. No studies on biodistribution, toxicology, fertility, mutagenesis, long term studies.
Chasing a virus with a vaccine is like trying to pick a booger through a mask. The virus is constantly evovlving. Currently the shots are two variants behind.
Birx lied to the prez and the nation. She recently said "I think we overplayed the vaccines". She admits this in her recent book. She is basically saying "We lied to you!"
Where were the CDC's weekly updates? Monthly? Never happened. They hid all the info from the taxpayers that fund them.
They hid the death and chronic harm from all of us.
Natural immunity? Fauci has said in the past that once we have had a disease we have the broadest immunity possible. He also lied about the vax being better than natural immunity.

Walensky - she recently said that all vaccines are important - polio, covid etc. She is continuing to lie even when they know that the vaccines don't prevent anything and are harmful. She and the others need to be fired because they do not have our best interests in mind. There is a clip from 2019 where Fauci says that it takes a long time to approve a vax UNLESS you have a pandemic, in which case it goes fast. How convenient!

The Thai paper (which I put a whole John Campbell video up about, in the psychosis in kids thread) is a good study.
They took 200 boys and 100 girls who came for their shots. They monitored them for a few weeks and they monitored their blood, mri's, ekg's etc. They found a huge 29.2% with some sort of cardiac manifestation. 1 in forty something (!) got myocarditis.
Dr. Cole says NO MORE SHOTS FOR ANY CHILD. This is attempted murder. It is like saying that the class is going on a trip and ONLY ONE child will be pushed in front of a bus. You wouldn't send your child. And especially since over 90% of the kids had covid already!!
The shot is a cardio toxin. A known poison with a high risk rate.
Why give it to kids?
We know from the studies that it causes T-Cell exhaustion, DNA repair damage, mitochondrial damage in the brain, the body. Reverse transcriptions., destrys the eggs of young girls, affects sperm motility (Israeli study). In Germany and other countries the birth rates went WAY down.
The shots are causing autoimmune disease, cancer, cancer, cancer.
Now, Debra Conrad is trying to speak and hackers are managing to prevent this via zoom. Unreal. People don't want the truth to come out. Debra is a PA in a hospital and wants to report what went on in hospitals.

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Sun, Aug 21 2022, 2:38 pm

Debra Conrad is a PA who worked at a hospital and she was in a manegerial position.
After the vaccines started they begana to see alot of patients coming in with all kinds of problems. They had thought that the vax would be the way out of the pandemic. But they couldn't help but notice what was going on. People were getting sick. VAERS started in 1990. She researched the site ad saw that it says that the healathcare workers are required to report adverse events. She was so surprised because noone at the hospital had said a word about this.
One of the things they noticed was that the elderly in nursing homes would be vaccinated and come down with Covid and be admitted to the hospital a week later. Debra started to make reports to the VAERS system about blood clots, seizuers, cancers that had been in remmission for 20 years and suddenly recurred. At first her bosses didn't make a big deal about it but as time went on they didn't like it and said it was causing "vaccine hesitancy" in the hospital.
She maintains that a medical professional must "first do no harm". You cannot put aside your ethics. This whole thing should make everyone PAUSE. But noone wanted to do that. The bosses kept saying the mantra "safe and effective" and they didn't want reports made. The bottom financial line was what was important.
She refused to be silenced and kept speaking up to management. One day they WALKED HER OUT OF THE HOSPITAL IN THE MIDDLE OF HER SHIFT. End of story.
She encourages people to file their own VAERS report. It's a lengthy process but important.
Someone asked Debra about how the hospitals were being incentivized financially for giving the shots.
She said it started with $25 per shot and then it went up to $45.

During her talk there were hackers that tried desperately to keep the presentation from happening. B"H she got through it.

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Sun, Aug 21 2022, 6:20 pm

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Tue, Aug 23 2022, 4:31 pm

Why are people not looking at data and thinking for themselves?
I believe that there has been a subtle, orchestrated campaign for decades to program us to “trust the experts” and believe we can’t figure things out for ourselves.

Brucha Weisberger
Aug 23

BS”D

Every human being is gifted by their Creator with two eyes, and two ears to take in information, a brain to think, and an instinctive sense of what is beneficial or dangerous to them.

In G-d’s Army There’s Only Truth is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

G-d did not design the world in such a way that we need to research on Google in order to survive. Neither do we need the CDC or other “expert” authoritative instructions.

Humanity has survived and thrived way before these entities set themselves up to be our thought masters.

Torah Jews thank and praise G-d each day with 3 blessings for giving a human being wisdom and understanding to differentiate between good and bad. This is a critical survival instinct and means that every person of normal intelligence possesses the ability to delve into topics that are important for their survival and reach logical conclusions.

We do not need “experts” to think for us, and we should never abdicate our duty to THINK in favor of anyone else.

Of course, we can choose to ignore information, and our instincts can become blunted by propaganda which instills fear in us or tells us that we are unable to make good choices for ourselves.

And I believe that this is what has happened. The ideas that you cannot understand BIG, IMPORTANT things yourself and you need someone in a white coat or an Ivory Tower (or a fact checker on Google) to do so for you, and that these individuals are smart, unbiased, trustworthy, and all-knowing, and can make better decisions for your own life than you can, have been drummed into the population for many years.

Think: A smartphone in every hand, with the convenience of Google to “research” anything you want - but come out with the information they’ve programmed it for you to find, articles available on every topic where “experts” weigh in and unabashedly tell you HOW to think about issues, a cadre of Ivory Leaguers in every field offering their “expert” advice, well-paid fact checkers to handily debunk any ideas veering off course … and of course, plenty of ridicule for those who dare to think independently.

The herd has been trained to follow. Independent thought is almost extinct.

And then came the events of 2019 and 2020, and most of the population fell right into line, thinking just as they should - or rather, not thinking, just as they should.

Steve Kirsch wrote something very enlightening:

Inside the mind of one of my very smart pro-vax friends
Here's how they think. It's 100% based on deference to authority. If you ask them for data to back up their claims, they stop responding.
I recently talked to a friend of mine at a recent social event. We’ll call him Bob. He’s super smart about most things. But when it comes to the vaccine, he’s blind to the truth.

He was bragging about how he has been vaxxed 6 times with the COVID vax and he’s perfectly healthy. He can’t wait for SB 866 in California to pass so when his kids turn 12, they can decide to get the vaccine over their mother’s objections.

Bob thinks I’m a nut case, cherry picking data. He says I used to be respected, but after turning anti-vax, people have lost all respect for me. He said I have a religious belief about the vaccine and I’m not driven by data.

What he isn’t telling anyone is that he’s been losing his vision ever since he got his first COVID vaccine. He used to have 20/20 vision, but now he wears glasses and can’t drive at night. When I brought up the data showing the connection between the shots and vision loss, he changed the topic.

I showed him two papers showing the more you vaccinate, the sicker you get (see the two papers here). I asked, “Where are the papers that show the opposite?” He ignored my request.

He gets his belief system from the mainstream media. Full stop. He reasons that if I was correct, surely Bill Gates would agree with me and admit they goofed. It’s 100% deference to authority.

Bob will not look at the data himself and he doesn’t want to discuss it. He will not engage. He thinks that if I was right, there would be more than a handful of people speaking out. So he tallies the size of the support base on each side of an issue instead of looking at the data.

I hope this is useful in helping you understand the pro-vaxxers and how they think.

The important thing is you cannot turn these people around. Arguing with them is fruitless because they don’t want to see the data. They will only come around when the people they trust change their position.

This is why we need to focus on protecting doctors who speak out.

Perhaps a state ballot initiative in California providing that doctors cannot be retaliated against when they tell the truth (including having social media accounts taken down, having their license to practice medicine revoked, etc). That would prevent things like this from ever happening again.

Steve Kirsch's newsletter
Inside the mind of one of my very smart pro-vax friends
I recently talked to a friend of mine at a recent social event. We’ll call him Bob. He’s super smart about most things. But when it comes to the vaccine, he’s blind to the truth. He was bragging about how he has been vaxxed 6 times with the COVID vax and he’s perfectly healthy. He can’t wait for SB 866 in California to pass so when his kids turn 12, they…
Read more
a day ago · 1,899 likes · 1,456 comments · Steve Kirsch
•••

Steve is bringing to light very important information to help us understand the people that aren’t looking at data, and refuse to do so, based on blind obedience to authority and the belief that they’re incapable of figuring anything important out for themselves.

However, I doubt that the ballot initiative idea in CA will work.

More fundamentally, though, I really think we need to get to the root of the problem, by somehow deprogramming people and helping them start thinking for themselves, instead of just continuing to follow blindly and stay vulnerable to whatever the “experts” cook up next.

amother

↑ Tealblue ↓

Tue, Aug 23 2022, 9:37 pm

Interesting article on Dr. Mercola:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/.....money

amother

↑ Gladiolus ↓

Tue, Aug 23 2022, 9:43 pm

Don’t know much about mercola or the daily beast either way but do know a fluff hit piece when I read one - psa no need to waste anyone else’s time

amother

↑ Gladiolus ↓

Tue, Aug 23 2022, 9:46 pm

Thanks for the education just learned Wikipedia calls the daily beast a tabloid
A far left tabloid at that

amother

↑ Pansy ↓

Tue, Aug 23 2022, 10:06 pm

It isn’t just Wikipedia. It’s founder also calls it a tabloid. https://www.thefactual.com/blo.....ased/
https://www.quora.com/Is-The-D.....-real
https://www.allsides.com/news-.....-bias

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 4:28 am

Seriously - people on this forum bash me as posting "conspiracy garbage".
I guess that's what this is.

August 19, 2022
Vascular and organ damage induced by mRNA vaccines: irrefutable proof of causality
In Depth Popular Science
More
Michael Palmer, MD and Sucharit Bhakdi, MD
doctors4covidethics.org

This article summarizes evidence from experimental studies and from autopsies of patients deceased after vaccination. The collective findings demonstrate that

mRNA vaccines don’t stay at the injection site by instead travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs,
mRNA-based COVID vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs,
vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation,
vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcome.
We note that the damage mechanism is which emerges from the autopsy studies is not limited to COVID-19 vaccines only but is completely general—it must be expected to occur similarly with mRNA vaccines against any and all infectious pathogens. This technology has failed and must be abandoned.

While clinical case reports (e.g. [1,2]) and statistical analyses of accumulated adverse event reports (e.g. [3,4]) provide valuable evidence of damage induced by mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, it is important to establish a causal relationship in individual cases. Pathology remains the gold standard for proof of disease causation. This short paper will discuss some key findings on autopsy materials from patients who died within days to several months after vaccination. For context, some experimental studies are briefly discussed as well.

1. Most of the evidence presented here is from the work of pathologist Prof. Arne Burkhardt, MD
Dr. Burkhardt was approached by the families of patients deceased after “vaccination”
Autopsy materials were examined by standard histopathology and immunohistochemistry
Based on the findings, most deaths were attributed to “vaccination” with a high to very high degree of likelihood
Prof. Burkhardt is a very experienced pathologist from Reutlingen, Germany. With the help of his colleague Prof. Walter Lang, he has studied numerous cases of death which occurred within days to several months after vaccination. In each of these cases, the cause of death had been certified as “natural” or “unknown.” Burkhardt became involved only because the bereaved families doubted these verdicts and sought a second opinion. It is remarkable, therefore, that Burkhardt found not just a few but the majority of these deaths to be due to vaccination.

While all four major manufacturers of gene-based vaccines were represented in the sample of patients studied by Burkhardt and Lang, most patients had received an mRNA vaccine from either Pfizer or Moderna. Some of the deceased patients had received both mRNA- and viral vector-based vaccines on separate occasions.

2. Pfizer’s own animal experiments show that the vaccine quickly distributes throughout the body

In order to cause potentially lethal damage, the mRNA vaccines must first distribute from the injection site to other organs. That such distribution occurs is apparent from animal experiments reported by Pfizer to Japanese authorities with its application for vaccine approval in that country [5]. Rats were injected intramuscularly with a radioactively labelled model mRNA vaccine, and the movement of the radiolabel first into the bloodstream and subsequently into various organs was followed for up to 48 hours.

The first thing to note is that the labelled vaccine shows up in the blood plasma after a very short time—within only a quarter of an hour. The plasma level peaks two hours after the injection. As it drops off, the model vaccine accumulates in several other organs. The fastest and highest rise is observed in the liver and the spleen. Very high uptake is also observed with the ovaries and the adrenal glands. Other organs (including the testes) take up significantly lower levels of the model vaccine. We note, however, that at least the blood vessels will be exposed and affected in every organ and in every tissue.

The rapid and widespread distribution of the model vaccine implies that we must expect expression of the spike protein throughout the body. For a more in-depth discussion of this biodistribution study, see Palmer2021b.

3. Expression of viral proteins can be detected with immunohistochemistry

While the distribution of the model vaccine leads us to expect widespread expression of the spike protein, we are here after solid proof. Such proof can be obtained using immunohistochemistry, which method is illustrated in this slide for the vaccine-encoded spike protein.

If a vaccine particle—composed of the spike-encoding mRNA, coated with lipids—enters a body cell, this will cause the spike protein to be synthesized within the cell and then taken to the cell surface. There, it can be recognized by a spike-specific antibody. After washing the tissue specimen to remove unbound antibody molecules, the bound ones can be detected with a secondary antibody that is coupled with some enzyme, often horseradish peroxidase. After another washing step, the specimen is incubated with a water-soluble precursor dye that is converted by the enzyme to an insoluble brown pigment. Each enzyme molecule can rapidly convert a large number of dye molecules, which greatly amplifies the signal.

At the top right of the image, you can see two cells which were exposed to the Pfizer vaccine and then subjected to the protocol outlined above. The intense brown stain indicates that the cells were indeed producing the spike protein.

In short, wherever the brown pigment is deposited, the original antigen—in this example, the spike protein—must have been present. Immunohistochemistry is widely used not only in clinical pathology but also in research; it could readily have been used to detect widespread expression of spike protein in animal trials during preclinical development. However, it appears that the FDA and other regulators never received or demanded such experimental data [6].

4. Expression of spike protein in shoulder muscle after vaccine injection

This slide (by Dr. Burkhardt) shows deltoid muscle fibres in cross section. Several (but not all) of the fibres show strong brown pigmentation, again indicating spike protein expression.

While the expression of spike protein near the injection site is of course expected and highly suggestive, we would like to make certain that such expression is indeed caused by the vaccine and not by a concomitant infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This is particularly important with respect to other tissues and organs which are located far away from the injection site.

5. Coronavirus particles contain two prominent proteins: spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N)

To distinguish between infection and injection, we can again use immunohistochemistry, but this time apply it to another SARS-CoV-2 protein—namely, the nucleocapsid, which is found inside the virus particle, where it enwraps and protects the RNA genome. The rationale of this experiment is simple: cells infected with the virus will express all viral proteins, including the spike and the nucleocapsid. In contrast, the mRNA-based COVID vaccines (as well as the adenovirus vector-based ones produced by AstraZeneca and Janssen) will induce expression only of spike.

6. Infected persons express the nucleocapsid protein (and also the spike protein)

This slide simply illustrates that the method works: lung tissue or cells from a nasal swab of a person infected with SARS-CoV-2 stain positive for nucleocapsid expression, whereas cultured cells exposed to the vaccine do not (but they stain strongly positive for the spike protein; see inset at the top right of Slide 3).

7. Injected persons express only the spike protein, which implicates the vaccine

Here, we see immunohistochemistry applied to heart muscle tissue from an injected person. Staining for the presence of spike protein causes strong brown pigment deposition. In contrast, only very weak, non-specific staining is observed with the antibody that recognizes the nucleocapsid protein. The absence of nucleocapsid indicates that the expression of the spike protein must be attributed ot the vaccine rather than an infection with SARS-CoV-2.

We will see shortly that the strong expression of spike protein in heart muscle after vaccination correlates with significant inflammation and tissue destruction.

8. Expression of spike protein within the walls of small blood vessels

We see spike protein expression in arterioles (small arteries; left) as well as in venules (small veins) and capillaries (right). Expression is most prominent in the innermost cell layer, the endothelium. This makes the endothelial cells “sitting ducks” for an attack by the immune system.

9. Endothelial stripping and destruction of a small blood vessel after vaccination

We now turn to the evidence of immune attack on the endothelial cells which produce the spike protein. On the left, a normal venule, delimited by an intact endothelium and containing some red blood cells and few white blood cells (stained blue) inside.

The image on at the centre shows a venule that is being attacked and destroyed by the immune system. The outline is already dissolving, and the spindle-shaped (and swollen) endothelial cells have peeled off from the vessel wall. Furthermore, we see lymphocytes—the small cells with dark, round nuclei and with very little cytoplasm around them; a single lymphocyte (at much higher magnification) is shown on the right.

Lymphocytes are the backbone of the specific immune system—whenever antigens are recognized and antibodies are produced, this is done by lymphocytes. Also among the lymphocytes we find cytotoxic T cells and natural killer cells, which serve to kill virus-infected cells—or ones that look to them as if infected, because they have been forced to produce a viral protein by a so-called vaccine.

A crucial function of the endothelium is to prevent blood clotting. Thus, if the endothelium is damaged, as it is in this picture, and the tissues beyond it make contact with the blood, this will automatically set off blood clotting.

10. A crack in the wall of the aorta, lined by clusters of lymphocytes, leading to aortic rupture

On the left, a section through the wall of an aorta. This picture is taken at an even lower magnification than the one before; the lymphocytes now appear as just a cloud of tiny blue specks. To the left of this blue cloud, we see a vertical crack running through the tissue. Such a crack is also visible macroscopically in the excised specimen of an aorta shown on the right.

The aorta is the largest blood vessel of the body. It receives the highly pressurized blood ejected by the left ventricle of the heart, and it is thus exposed to intense mechanical stress. If the wall of the aorta is weakened by inflammation, as it is here, then it may crack and rupture. Aortic rupture is normally quite rare, but Prof. Burkhardt found multiple cases in his limited number of autopsies. Some of the affected aortas were also shown to have expressed the spike protein.

11. Healthy heart muscle tissue, and lymphocytic myocarditis
In Slide 7, we saw that heart muscle cells strongly expressed the spike protein after vaccine injection. Here, we see the consequences. The picture on the shows a sample of healthy heart muscle tissue, with regularly oriented and aligned heart muscle fibres. On the right, we see a heart muscle sample from one of the autopsies. The muscle fibres are disjointed and disintegrating, and they are surrounded by invading lymphocytes. Burkhardt found myocarditis in multiple of his deceased patients.

12. Lymphocytic infiltration and proliferative inflammation in lung tissue

On the left, we see healthy lung tissue, with air-filled spaces (the alveoli), delimited by delicate alveolar septa with embedded, blood-filled capillaries. We also see some larger blood vessels.

On the right hand side, we see lung tissue overrun by lymphocytes. The air-filled spaces have largely disappeared and been filled with scar (connective) tissue. This vaccine-injected patient would obviously have had very great trouble breathing.

Lymphocytic infiltration, inflammation and destruction were also observed in many other organs, including the brain, the liver, the spleen, and multiple glands. However, instead of illustrating them all, we will conclude the pathological evidence with another immunohistochemistry result, which strikingly shows the long duration of spike protein expression.

13. Vaccine-induced expression of spike protein in a bronchial biopsy nine months after vaccination

The slide shows a sample of bronchial mucous membrane, from a patient who is alive but has suffered respiratory symptoms ever since being vaccinated. We see several cells in the uppermost cell layer that strongly express spike protein—and this even nine months after his most recent vaccine injection! While this is indeed the most extreme case of long-lasting expression, there is evidence both from Burkhardt’s autopsies and from published studies on blood samples [7] or lymph node biopsies [8] to indicate that expression does last several months.

14. The Pfizer vaccine mRNA gets copied (“reverse-transcribed”) into DNA and inserted into the cellular genome

The official mRNA vaccine narrative maintains that the modified mRNA contained in the vaccine will not be replicated in vivo; expression of the spike protein should therefore cease once the injected RNA molecules have been degraded.

The limited experimental studies available [9,10] suggest that the injected modified mRNA should be degraded within days to a few weeks of the injection. This is obviously difficult to square with the observed long-lasting expression; in some form or other, the genetic information appears to be perpetuated in vivo.

A recent experimental study from Sweden [11] has shown that human-derived cells can copy the Pfizer mRNA vaccine into DNA and then insert it into their own chromosomal DNA. The image shows the key evidence from this study. The cells were exposed to the vaccine for the lengths of time indicated. Cellular DNA was then isolated, and inserted DNA copies of the vaccine mRNA detected by PCR amplification of a fragment 444 base pairs (bp) in length.

All samples labelled with “BNT” had been treated with the vaccine, and they all show a PCR product of the expected length, as is evident from comparison to a DNA fragment length standard (“L”). Samples labelled with “Ctrl n” were controls: Ctrl 1– 4 contained DNA from cells not incubated with vaccine, Ctrl 5 contained RNA (not DNA) from vaccine-treated cells; Ctrl 6 contained the same but was additionally treated with RNAse, which step was also performed in the purification of DNA samples. As expected, none of the control samples contain the PCR product.

Considering Aldén’s observation of DNA insertion in every single experimental sample, it seems highly likely that this will also occur in vivo. Beyond providing a plausible mechanism for perpetuating the expression of spike protein, DNA insertion also poses risks of genetic damage, leading to cancers and leukemias.

15. Summary
The evidence presented here clearly demonstrates a chain of causation from vaccine injection to

rapid distribution of the vaccine through the bloodstream,
widespread spike protein expression, prominently in blood vessels, and
autoimmune-like inflammation and organ damage.
Vaccine-induced vascular damage will promote blood clotting, and clotting-related diseases such as heart attack, stroke, lung embolism are very common in the adverse events databases [4,12].

In addition to autoimmune-like inflammation, other disease mechanisms, including prion-mediated CNS degeneration [13], aberrant vascular protein deposition (amyloidosis) [14,15], and lipid nanoparticle toxicity [16], are plausible but require further study and corroboration. Overall, these vaccines can no longer be considered experimental—the “experiment” has resulted in the disaster that many medical doctors and scientists predicted from the outset [17]. The vaccination must be stopped, and all approvals and authorizations of their use must be revoked.

References
Bozkurt, B. et al. (2021) Myocarditis With COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. Circulation 144:471-484
Ehrlich, P. et al. (2021) Biopsy-proven lymphocytic myocarditis following first mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in a 40-year-old male: case report. Clinical research in cardiology official journal of the German Cardiac Society 110:1855-1859
Rose, J. and McCullough, P.A. (2021) A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products. Current problems in cardiology p. 101011
Shilhavy, B. (2022) 43,898 Dead, 4,190,493 Injured Following COVID Vaccines in European Database of Adverse Reactions.
Anonymous, (2020) SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048) 2.6.4 Summary statement of the pharmacokinetic study [English translation].
Latyopva, A. (2022) Did Pfizer Perform Adequate Safety Testing for its Covid-19 mRNA Vaccine in Preclinical Studies? Evidence of Scientific and Regulatory Fraud.
Bansal, S. et al. (2021) Cutting Edge: Circulating Exosomes with COVID Spike Protein Are Induced by BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) Vaccination prior to Development of Antibodies: A Novel Mechanism for Immune Activation by mRNA Vaccines. J. Immunol. 207:2405-2410
Röltgen, K. et al. (2022) Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Cell (preprint)
Andries, O. et al. (2015) N1-methylpseudouridine-incorporated mRNA outperforms pseudouridine-incorporated mRNA by providing enhanced protein expression and reduced immunogenicity in mammalian cell lines and mice. J. Control. Release 217:337-344
Pardi, N. et al. (2018) Nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines induce potent T follicular helper and germinal center B cell responses. J. Exp. Med. 215:1571-1588
Aldén, M. et al. (2022) Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 44:1115-1126
Anonymous, (2021) OpenVAERS.
Perez, J.C. et al. (2022) Towards the emergence of a new form of the neurodegenerative Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: Twenty six cases of CJD declared a few days after a COVID-19 “vaccine” Jab. ResearchGate (preprint)
Charnley, M. et al. (2022) Neurotoxic amyloidogenic peptides in the proteome of SARS-COV2: potential implications for neurological symptoms in COVID-19. Nat. Commun. 13:3387
Nyström, S. and Hammarström, P. (2022) Amyloidogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144:8945-8950
Palmer, M. and Bhakdi, S. (2021) The Pfizer mRNA vaccine: Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity.
Bhakdi, S. et al. (2021) Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns.

amother

↑ Pansy ↓

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 8:06 am

Maybe I’m naive, but I don’t know anyone who has been affected negatively by the vaccine. I’m not saying it doesn’t happen, but I know people all over the world who have gotten every vaccine or not get vaccinated and I don’t know anyone who got vaccinated who had any major reactions. Correlation is not causation.
What you’re describing in your last post to me looks like what happens with every vaccine. Every vaccine travels everywhere in the body and goes to every major organ. And yes, if an autopsy is done I’m pretty sure you can tell if someone had any vaccine. This is a good example of using big words to look all official and sound scary in my opinion.

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 9:38 am

If you have the courage check out realnotrare.com

Vaccine injured people from all over sent in their written and videoed stories. They are very upset that the world is censoring and delegitimizing their injuries.

amother

↑ Pansy ↓

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 9:58 am

I looked at the website, and I read some stories. I just clicked on the top ones. All of them are sad but honestly I don’t think any of them are connected to the covid vaccine. They guy with a brain tumor? Tumors grow and no matter how slowly they grow eventually they’re gonna get big enough to have to be dealt with. And kidney infections six months later? Seriously? And someone who I think was in psychiatric meds and then lost health insurance and then things happen? I feel bad for these people, I truly do,
But I really don’t think they’re connected to the vaccine. Maybe I’m wrong. Whatever.

amother

↑ Tealblue

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 10:04 am

ChossidMom wrote:

Even if these stories were 100% true and connected to the vaccine, which I doubt,the amount of lives the vaccine has saved far outweighs these stories. I remember how many people were dying in the beginning of Covid. The drop now is due to the vaccine.

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 10:10 am

amother Tealblue wrote:

People were dying because they were denied early treatment. They were told to stay home and do nothing until they couldn't breathe. By the time they were admitted to the hospital they often wound up on ventilators. Many died.

amother

↑ Babyblue

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 10:17 am

ChossidMom wrote:

I don't 100% agree with either side. (Sorry.)

But chossidmom is right that a large part of why people died at the beginning was the fact that drs didn't know how to care for them, even to point of something as simple as not knowing how to lie them in the bed to assist breathing. I also strongly feel that not allowing very sick people to see their loved ones (very common at the beginning) was not just cruel but dangerous. We all know studies about how seeing loved ones helps people heal.

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 10:19 am

There was no protocol for early treatment whatsoever. I can post videos and more videos of top doctors discussing this. The reason for this is that there is more money in vaccines. The early treatment drugs were all re-purposed drugs that costs cents and existed already (hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin). They could have save hundreds of thousands of people, according to the doctors who use them successfully.

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 10:21 am

https://healthimpactnews.com/2.....shot/

↑ ChossidMom ↓

Wed, Aug 24 2022, 10:35 am

amother Babyblue wrote:

The doctors were crying out in 2020 - doctors like Pierre Kory, Paul Marik, Peter McCullough - who were all treating Covid patients.They were crying out that they weren't allowed to use drugs for early treatment. They came to testify in the senate and I can post the recordings. They were literally crying that they were not being allowed to treat patients. Ultimately, these doctors were terminated from their hospitals for telling the truth. Nobody can rewrite history. It's all out there. But not on Google. They will tell you these doctors are evil. But the truth is like a beachball under water. It will eventually bob up. You cannot keep it down forever.

Here is a senate meeting: https://yournews.com/2022/01/2.....hill/

Please watch the video. See their faces. Listen to their voices. Then, tell me if you believe them or not.