 |
|
 |
 |
|
|
Forum
-> The Social Scene
-> Entertainment
amother
|
 Yesterday at 12:38 am
|
Especially now after an old interview with Armie Hammer surfaced calling her a diva and difficult to work with.
| |
|
| Back to top |
 0
 0
|
|
amother
Holly
|
Yesterday at 12:51 am
Celebrities (in general) are the epitome of sheker. So no, I don't beleive her.
Last edited by amother on Wed, Jan 08 2025, 12:59 am; edited 1 time in total
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
10
|
|
amother
Ultramarine
|
Yesterday at 12:55 am
I believe they’re both partially right and both partially lying.
They’re both flawed humans who have the money and power to air out their dirty laundry and declare one of themselves the “right” one.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
13
|
buspickup
↓
|
Yesterday at 1:01 am
Not really, she talked about the movie “it ends with us” as if it’s a romcom. She was downright nasty to interviewers.
Another amber heard 🙄
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
9
|
amother
|
Yesterday at 1:06 am
| buspickup wrote: | Not really, she talked about the movie “it ends with us” as if it’s a romcom. She was downright nasty to interviewers.
Another amber heard 🙄 |
I agree
I can't stand these women that try to victimize themselves. They ruin it for the real victims.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
0
|
|
amother
Grape
|
Yesterday at 1:27 am
|
Why is everyone so sure she’s not telling the truth? I think it’s possible she is and possible she isn’t but if she is telling the truth it’s a shame that no one would believe it.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
7
|
amother
|
Yesterday at 1:29 am
| amother OP wrote: | | Especially now after an old interview with Armie Hammer surfaced calling her a diva and difficult to work with. |
I don't know the details of the accusations. I saw an interview of her where she came across as a "mean girl", but again, idk what she's being accused of or if it's true.
But I wouldn't be looking to a self-professed emotional abuser (accused of assault) for evidence.
https://www.vulture.com/articl......html
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
3
|
|
amother
Chambray
|
Yesterday at 6:51 am
|
They both seem like nasty people
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
1
|
icedcoffee
↓
|
Yesterday at 8:04 am
She can be a diva and a mean girl and also have been the victim of s-xual harassment. It's pretty telling that everyone else involved with the film is standing by her and not Justin.
| buspickup wrote: | | Not really, she talked about the movie “it ends with us” as if it’s a romcom. |
Did you read the lawsuit? Because this was specifically addressed and your comment is exactly what Justin's team was hoping to accomplish.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
5
|
amother
|
Yesterday at 8:12 am
|
Im appalled that anyone here is picking a side! How would anyone who’s not part of their inner group, know what happened there? It’s very telling.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
10
|
|
amother
Denim
|
Yesterday at 8:14 am
|
I do believe she is a "mean girl" and bullies people but I do believe her with the allegations aswell. Both can be true at the same time.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
2
|
|
amother
Yellow
|
Yesterday at 8:19 am
| amother Bronze wrote: | | Im appalled that anyone here is picking a side! How would anyone who’s not part of their inner group, know what happened there? It’s very telling. |
Nobody knows a thing but maybe have seen her act. Personally, when women complain they have been harassed, I believe them.
When women come to Ima and say they’re being abused, and we only have their words not his, do we doubt her?
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
2
|
↑
icedcoffee
↓
|
Yesterday at 8:21 am
| amother Bronze wrote: | | Im appalled that anyone here is picking a side! How would anyone who’s not part of their inner group, know what happened there? It’s very telling. |
Because there are 80+ pages of published evidence, documents, and communications that show what happened?
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
1
|
amother
|
Yesterday at 8:24 am
I think “harassment” is a strong term. I believe some what she’s saying, but I think most of it is blown out of proportion. She was upset at him because of the weight issue. Most likely everything after that point was just dramatized. I’m not saying she didn’t feel uncomfortable, but that doesn’t make him guilty.
The only legitimate thing I believe is him walking into her dressing room and seeing her in a compromising position, obviously really uncomfortable and awkward. But I also think it’s most likely a mistake and accident, and it wasn’t done intentionally to see her in a compromising position
I think everyone on the cast is on her side because when you have a woman say anything remotely related to “me too” you have to believe them
Do I think he deserves to be sued? No
And the portion of the lawsuit relating to his PR team was really unnecessary. I guarantee you that her PR team is just as guilty, if not more so. That is standard protocol for any Hollywood actor and they actually were much tamer than I expected. Most of the bad press she brought on herself
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
8
|
Ema of 5
|
Yesterday at 8:26 am
| icedcoffee wrote: | | Because there are 80+ pages of published evidence, documents, and communications that show what happened? |
I’m guessing most people haven’t read through all 80 pages….
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
2
|
amother
|
Yesterday at 8:26 am
| icedcoffee wrote: | | Because there are 80+ pages of published evidence, documents, and communications that show what happened? |
That isn’t proof of anything. It’s documentation written by her lawyers from HER perspective
The text messages are cherry picked and don’t show the whole story. And they aren’t that bad, considering
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
5
|
↑
buspickup
↓
|
Yesterday at 8:27 am
| icedcoffee wrote: |
Did you read the lawsuit? Because this was specifically addressed and your comment is exactly what Justin's team was hoping to accomplish. |
Yes I did and I was thinking the same ans you. And then I read the counter lawsuit from Justin. Justin sues the New York Times for defamation, he provides receipts that we can see that the Blake team nitpicked information to make Justin look bad. For ex blake claims Justin walked in on her while bf her baby, in Justin provided receipts it shows that she asked him to come in to review some lines.
At the end of the day we can never know what really happened. But evidence don’t lie.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
2
|
↑
icedcoffee
↓
|
Yesterday at 8:45 am
| amother Myrtle wrote: | That isn’t proof of anything. It’s documentation written by her lawyers from HER perspective
|
A contract signed by Blake and Justin during the production of the film is not "documentation written by her lawyers from her perspective," it's literally something that happened. Is it open and shut proof that can never be questioned? Obviously not or we wouldn't need a trial, we could all just pack it up right here. But the documentation and evidence tells a story. We're all happy to hear Justin's side when he releases his own documentation.
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
1
|
↑
icedcoffee
|
Yesterday at 8:49 am
| buspickup wrote: | Yes I did and I was thinking the same ans you. And then I read the counter lawsuit from Justin. Justin sues the New York Times for defamation, he provides receipts that we can see that the Blake team nitpicked information to make Justin look bad. For ex blake claims Justin walked in on her while bf her baby, in Justin provided receipts it shows that she asked him to come in to review some lines.
At the end of the day we can never know what really happened. But evidence don’t lie. |
I do think there was nastiness and lies on both sides and we'll have to wait until the dust settles to see exactly what was what. But specifically about the "rom com" promotion - the instructions Blake received were to "[f]ocus more on [her character's] strength and resilience as opposed to describing the film as a story about domestic violence" and to "[a]void talking about this film [sic] that makes it feel sad or heavy, it's a story of hope." Whether you think she did a good job of that or not, she was literally instructed to downplay the domestic violence and make the marketing more positive. Justin was following the same exact script and would gush excitedly about the flower shop and stuff.
Then, when things started to look publicly bad for Justin, he cancelled his own social media posts that followed the marketing plan and instead told his team to find a bunch of stuff instead about trauma and domestic violence. His PR person even told him that the shift in tone might be "too drastic too soon" but then admitted it was working, and helped him prioritize the domestic violence content on his socials in order to "be helpful for the news cycle." He wanted to use private DMs from survivors, this was all self serving on his part. And now months later we have someone an imamother how they "don't really believe" Blake because she didn't take the DV stuff seriously in the promotion and Justin did - literally exactly what they were trying to get the online discourse to say.
| |
|
| Back to top |
1
2
|
|
amother
Almond
|
Yesterday at 8:59 am
|
I don't get into these stories but I'm just generally disappointed because although I don't know too much about her expect the odd thing that pops up on my social media feeds now and then, she looked like a nice mother and a reasonable person...
| |
|
| Back to top |
0
2
|
| Related Topics |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
|
I cannot believe I just did that
|
4 |
Tue, Dec 31 2024, 8:59 am  |
|
|
Tell me why you don't believe in pandas
|
130 |
Fri, Dec 20 2024, 7:52 am |
|
|
What Conspiracy Theory Do You Believe
|
251 |
Thu, Dec 05 2024, 7:06 pm |
|
|
ISO Lively Hakafos in BP, which Shuls can women see and
|
2 |
Wed, Oct 23 2024, 3:43 pm |
|
|
Book recommendation on why to believe
|
70 |
Tue, Oct 15 2024, 10:20 pm |
|
|
Imamother may earn commission when you use our links to make a purchase.
© 2025 Imamother.com - All rights reserved
|  |
 |
|
 |
|
|
