Home
Log in / Sign Up
    Private Messages   Rules   New User Guide   FAQ   Advertise   Contact Us  
Forum -> Vacation and Traveling
Leaving a 11 month baby with siblings and grandmother
Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next



Post new topic   Reply to topic View latest: 24h 48h 72h

amother
Honeydew


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 3:47 pm
I hope you went and cane home safely. Don't let other peoples anxiety derail your plans. Your bay, grandma and you will he just fine.
Back to top

  giftedmom  




 
 
    
 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 3:47 pm
amother Jetblack wrote:
she's fine now. Maybe or maybe not will did it have a lasting effect, you cant know.

But WHILE you were away vacationing, this child suffered silently. I'm sure she was well taken care of physically and even emotionally given lots of attention. But you just disappeared from her life for a week! THAT IS TRAUMATIZING!

There’s a therapeutic concept called rupture and repair. Look it up. It’s in a sense healthy for a child, even a baby, to experience.
Back to top

amother
  Jetblack  


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 3:54 pm
giftedmom wrote:
There’s a therapeutic concept called rupture and repair. Look it up. It’s in a sense healthy for a child, even a baby, to experience.
I appreciate your post!
I leave my baby for an hour or two from time to time. I leave her with people she knows well.
Back to top

amother
  Chambray  


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 4:12 pm
amother Jetblack wrote:
I seem traumatized?? Please explain.
I agree that OP's arrangements are super and the best case scenario if you need to leave a child.
I would still not do it.
And I am voicing my opinion. Why does that make me traumatized or feeding my kids with trauma? Why do people with different opinions act defensively?


The tone of your posts come across as dramatic and traumatized.
Back to top

amother
  Seafoam  


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 4:14 pm
giftedmom wrote:
There’s a therapeutic concept called rupture and repair. Look it up. It’s in a sense healthy for a child, even a baby, to experience.

No, we don’t create conditions for rupture and repair.
If an attachment is ruptured it can potentially be repaired but we don’t set the stage for that ideally.

Op, it’s possible your baby will be fine but it’s also possible your baby will be traumatized.

I may be in the minority but I feel strongly that babies should be with their mothers unless it is an emergency. For a vacation wait a few months where she will be older and be able to understand better what is happening. It has the potential to be very traumatizing for a baby.
Back to top

#BestBubby  




 
 
    
 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 4:22 pm
amother Jetblack wrote:
she's fine now. Maybe or maybe not will did it have a lasting effect, you cant know.

But WHILE you were away vacationing, this child suffered silently. I'm sure she was well taken care of physically and even emotionally given lots of attention. But you just disappeared from her life for a week! THAT IS TRAUMATIZING!


Are you a SAHM?

Because sending babies for many hours to babysitter is much worse.
Back to top

  kenz




 
 
    
 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 4:23 pm
amother Jetblack wrote:
I seem traumatized?? Please explain.
I agree that OP's arrangements are super and the best case scenario if you need to leave a child.
I would still not do it.
And I am voicing my opinion. Why does that make me traumatized or feeding my kids with trauma? Why do people with different opinions act defensively?


You honestly do sound over the top on this matter.
Back to top

amother
  Chambray


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 4:23 pm
amother Seafoam wrote:
No, we don’t create conditions for rupture and repair.
If an attachment is ruptured it can potentially be repaired but we don’t set the stage for that ideally.

Op, it’s possible your baby will be fine but it’s also possible your baby will be traumatized.

I may be in the minority but I feel strongly that babies should be with their mothers unless it is an emergency. For a vacation wait a few months where she will be older and be able to understand better what is happening. It has the potential to be very traumatizing for a baby.

A vacation that will strengthen the marriage, can often be an emergency.
Back to top

  #BestBubby




 
 
    
 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 4:24 pm
amother Seafoam wrote:
No, we don’t create conditions for rupture and repair.
If an attachment is ruptured it can potentially be repaired but we don’t set the stage for that ideally.

Op, it’s possible your baby will be fine but it’s also possible your baby will be traumatized.

I may be in the minority but I feel strongly that babies should be with their mothers unless it is an emergency. For a vacation wait a few months where she will be older and be able to understand better what is happening. It has the potential to be very traumatizing for a baby.


A few months is not better.

A baby won't be able to understand

"Mommy is coming back in 2 days"

Until at least 2.5 years, maybe older.

Actually the younger a baby is the more easily they are ok with being cared by anyone,

although if you are nursing it wouldn't work.
Back to top

amother
Hibiscus


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 4:27 pm
Oh please, not traumatic for the baby. Please do it and enjoy
Back to top

amother
Obsidian


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 4:28 pm
Op I never leave such young ones but with your set-up I'd probably go in a heartbeat. Seams like a pretty perfect arrangement assuming grandma is fully capable of managing the kids well.
Back to top

amother
PlumPink


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 5:47 pm
amother Seafoam wrote:
For a baby it’s traumatic to be separated from their mother. Is it an emergency? If not wait another few months until baby is older.


This is an extremely dramatic way to look at it.
Op I think it’s completely fine and do it all the time for even longer. My babies are not traumatized
Back to top

  giftedmom  




 
 
    
 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 5:51 pm
amother Seafoam wrote:
No, we don’t create conditions for rupture and repair.
If an attachment is ruptured it can potentially be repaired but we don’t set the stage for that ideally.

Op, it’s possible your baby will be fine but it’s also possible your baby will be traumatized.

I may be in the minority but I feel strongly that babies should be with their mothers unless it is an emergency. For a vacation wait a few months where she will be older and be able to understand better what is happening. It has the potential to be very traumatizing for a baby.

So it was actually my therapist at the time who told me this
Back to top

amother
  Seafoam  


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 5:54 pm
giftedmom wrote:
So it was actually my therapist at the time who told me this

She is correct there is a concept like that . But we don’t give bandaids unless there is a cut and we don’t create cuts to be able to put on bandaids.
I hope the analogy is helpful for clarity.
Back to top

amother
  Blonde  


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 6:06 pm
amother Seafoam wrote:
No, we don’t create conditions for rupture and repair.
If an attachment is ruptured it can potentially be repaired but we don’t set the stage for that ideally.

Op, it’s possible your baby will be fine but it’s also possible your baby will be traumatized.

I may be in the minority but I feel strongly that babies should be with their mothers unless it is an emergency. For a vacation wait a few months where she will be older and be able to understand better what is happening. It has the potential to be very traumatizing for a baby.


How would waiting a few months help?

Op go vacation and have a great time. Your leaving your baby in good hands. It is highly unlikely your baby will suffer from lifelong trauma due to her grandma watching her for 2 days. If she can pinpoint this as her source of trauma when she is an adult, then you have an amazing child!
Back to top

  giftedmom




 
 
    
 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 6:07 pm
amother Seafoam wrote:
She is correct there is a concept like that . But we don’t give bandaids unless there is a cut and we don’t create cuts to be able to put on bandaids.
I hope the analogy is helpful for clarity.

She told me this specifically in regards to leaving a baby for a few days. Obviously no one would do it specifically for this reason but it doesn’t have to be traumatic in an overall healthy relationship.
Back to top

amother
Indigo


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 7:11 pm
#BestBubby wrote:
Are you a SAHM?

Because sending babies for many hours to babysitter is much worse.


Sending a 6 week old baby to a babysitter is way worse than staying home with siblings and grandma.
If babies have separation anxiety, how does anyone send to a babysitter under 2?
Do we have a traumatized generation?
Back to top

amother
  DarkGray  


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 7:18 pm
amother Indigo wrote:
Sending a 6 week old baby to a babysitter is way worse than staying home with siblings and grandma.
If babies have separation anxiety, how does anyone send to a babysitter under 2?
Do we have a traumatized generation?


Honestly, yes, I think we can see the effects in some communities.
Back to top

amother
  Blonde  


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 7:23 pm
amother DarkGray wrote:
Honestly, yes, I think we can see the effects in some communities.


Such as?
Back to top

amother
  DarkGray


 

Post Mon, Nov 27 2023, 7:26 pm
amother Blonde wrote:
Such as?


You want me to name where I've seen the effects? Of course I'm not going to do that. It would only upset people, many who may not feel they have an alternative.
Back to top
Page 4 of 5 Previous  1  2  3  4  5  Next Recent Topics




Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum -> Vacation and Traveling

Related Topics Replies Last Post
[ Poll ] When do you name a baby girl?
by amother
31 Today at 5:02 am View last post
Fish for 11 month old
by amother
9 Yesterday at 7:36 pm View last post
S/O Finances $1000 a month for food?
by amother
65 Thu, Dec 19 2024, 8:27 pm View last post
Brett Cooper leaving The Daily Wire
by corolla
90 Wed, Dec 18 2024, 9:30 pm View last post
Physical therapist for baby that comes to the house
by amother
11 Wed, Dec 18 2024, 3:08 pm View last post