Do we need to follow the chain of the first person who responded? Some posters are responding to the second or third response to a given word, thus giving them more time to post (not fair!) but also dividing the thread into multiple telephone lines. Mama, please clarify.
Do we need to follow the chain of the first person who responded? Some posters are responding to the second or third response to a given word, thus giving them more time to post (not fair!) but also dividing the thread into multiple telephone lines. Mama, please clarify.
Ok. This turned into a little bit of broken telephone...!
I meant the first poster that responds to a word. If you responded after someone else already did, we don't respond to that one, since it wasn't first in the chain.
Starting after this post, please do that! Otherwise, penalties will apply.
Ok. This turned into a little bit of broken telephone...!
I meant the first poster that responds to a word. If you responded after someone else already did, we don't respond to that one, since it wasn't first in the chain.
Starting after this post, please do that! Otherwise, penalties will apply.
I'm editing my original post to add this.
A bunch of posters already did that, and the current train of broken telephone is actually following a poster who was not the first one to respond. itsme123 was the first to respond to my post bulb with LED, but everyone is following the next response of burntout. So now what? Sorry for being so technical. I like to play games of which I understand the rules.
